NEW BERN SEMI-WEEKLY JOURNAL
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA march 30 1915
i
m
i
"TREATED ME LIKE A COMMON
CRIMINAL" SAYS SOLICITOR TO
THE INVESTIGATING COMMITTEE
Charles L. A be me thy Goes Before Investigators
On First Day of liking of Evidence Told
Straight Story of the Contempt Case---Several
Witnesses Examined During Day But There
Was No Sensationalism The Investigation
To Continue Today
The Legislative investigating Com
mittee in the famous Jude Frank
Carter-Soboitor Charles L. Abernethy
ease came to New Bern yesterday
morning and for eight long hours
they held forth in the Craven county
Couit House investigating the con-
tempt proceedings in whioh Judge shaking finger." Mr. Dunn explain
Carter played the stellar role with d to the committee that in his op
Sotcitor Abernethy playing the minor inicn the solicitoi was not insulting
parts.
abrupt and harsh.
The investigation was not spetacu-, Tne witnes8 then told of the fin
Jar, in fact, it was anything but 0f the solicitor by Judge Carter
spectacular, and it might be termed an1 of his Dejng piaced jn the custo
as partially sensational. Several wit- dy cf the sheriff,
nesses were examined, among whom.
was Solicitor Abernethy, who claims Cross Examination
to have been ill-treated by the judge, j Upon cross-examination by the
whose character has been assailed judges aUorney, Mr. Dunn stated
and who is seeking redress. The that 8oiicjtor Abernethy told the
solicitor made an excellent witness, j judge that the Baugham ease had
in -fact if there was anything that been continued bv consent. That the
he didn't remember about that court, true mU in the oase had been found
fise, it must have been mightyat the Scp(ember term of Craven
ineonsequental, and the wallops he Superior court. Mr. Dunn then re-
hnndod .liiflce Onrtor for his demeanor
toward 'him were indeed worthy of
the attention of the investigating
committee, and 'that they gave this
attention was manifested by the
manner in which they sat up
took notice during parts of the
citor's testimonv.
The solicitor was not the only one
who had some interesting testimony
to give. There was L. I. Moore, D.
E. Henderson, Edward Krit tan. of
the News and Observer, A. D.
McLean of Washington "and a few
others. Each of these gentlemen had
their own personal opinion about the
Li , -, wwwHtCT'4a whch Judge i(MmjM&
treated the solicitor and they did riot
mince words in expressing it. How
ever, there was fio lurid or thrdlng
testimony offered during the day.
Judge Carter was on hand all
through the proceedings and spent
considerable time in coaching his
counsel, Ex-Judge Manning. Mi-
Manning did seme pretty close cross-
examining, but he failed to shake
the evidence of a single one of the
witnesses and it appeared to nil as
though the day was a sort of case of
"round one for Abernethy."
At times the evidence, which is
necessarily of a repetitive order, be
came sort of monotonous, but the
investigating committee stuck man
fully by their guns and heard it all
through with apparent interest. At
0 o'clock las' evening a recess was
taken until this morning at 0:30
o'clock when the talcing of testimony
will again be lestimed. Just how
long the investigating committee will
remain in New Bern is a matter of
speculation. They may bo hue for
, three of four days or may possibly
call a hair at the conclusion of today's
session. Today probably whl be the
ino.-t sensational ol all and about
thirty-five witues-i's have beou sum
moned to be on hand when, the com
mittee resumes work this morning.
Morning Session
, The cession yestetday was sched
uled to begin at 10 o'clock and at that
hour the Court House where the
hearing was held, was well filled with
a group of curious gpeotatois How
ever it was 10:50 before Sheriff R. B.
Lane called the session to order and
Chairman Doughton called the com
mittee to order.
William Dunn
William Dunn, Jr., was the first
witnesB called to the stand by the
Abernethy forces. He stated that
his firm (Moore and Dunn) was con
nected with the Baugham oase, re
presenting the defendant. He told
of calling Solicitor Abernethy over
the phone before the oase was first
called and explained that he would
like to make arrangements about
giving bond This was in September.
In October the case was continued
on account of the witnesses (young
ladies and gentlemen) being off at
school.
In regard to the last continuance
Mr. Dunn stated that hit firm had
nothing to do with the last ccntin
anne. In regard to the February
term of court, Mr. Dunn told of the
fining of Clyde Kby nnd J. M. How
ard (jurors) being fined hy Judge
Carter for being late. He told of
the judge's demeanor refusing to
allow the gentlemen to pay by check
and telling the Sheriff t
fine.
olleot the!
"St Down"
In regard to the calling of the
Maugham cake. Mr. Dunn stated that
whli (hit WM rbe HoUoltor
artbe ,0 explain and Judge. Carter
abruptly called for the records in
tne ca8e Solicitor Abernethy again
attempted to explain" said the wit-
ness," and was told to "SIT DOWN,"
this time in a loud tone and with a
m the least while the judge was very
peated the events leading up to the
command to "sit down."
Asked a- to whether Solicitor Ab
ernethy was in an amicable mood,
Mr. Dunn stated that in his opinion
neither he nor the judge were in
such a mood.
Upon ex-amination by the Solicitor's
attorneys Mr. Dunn told of a case
in which Judge Carter had acted con
trarily in regard to the examination
of a witness in another case.
Asked in regard to whether any
finding of facts were read to the con
tempt proceedings, Mr. Dunn stat
ed that such was not done until the
frdfo whrg day
The inveHffjrating committee then
asked Mr. Dunn in regard to the
"amicable mood" of the solicitor
and a few other questions, after
which Solicitor Abernethy went on
the stand.
Solicitor Abernethv
Mr. Abernethv stated that he was
the solicitor in the fifth judicial, dis
trict giving a complete history of
his term in office. The solicitor then
launched into the case of State vs.
Baugham, first reading the present
ment in which the details of the kill
ing of James Ringold in an accident
were recounted; of" the finding of a
true bill in the ease and of '( upon
request and upon consent of Judge
Peebles)- its continuance. Solicitor
Abernethy stated that he did not
know Baugham and that the whole
matter of allowing bond was in the
hands of Judge Peebles.
The solicitor then told of the con
tinuance of the Baugham case in
October pn account of the absence
of very important witnesses who were
at school.
The Famous "Sit Down" '
Coming on down the line the so
licitor reached the February term,
1915, of Craven Superior Court
the term at which all the trouble
occurred. The witness then told
of previous pleasant co-operation -with
Judge Frank Carter and that when
he came into court that morning, he
greeted Right here Attorney Rouse
asked Mr. Abernethy if he had had
any correspondence on the Ringold
ease previous to the opening of
oourt, the solicitor then rend letters
fiom Harry Me Mullen, of Washing
ton, N. C, one of the defendant's
attorneys' relative to trying the case
at this term; another letter from M
D. Lane of Fort Barnwell, Craven
ecunty, a friend of the family of
Kingolds; another letter from Ms.
Ringold, widow of the deceased, in
which she expressed regret at the in
dictment of young Baugham and
told of a settlement with her and her
husband by the Baugham's. In
this letter, Mrs. Ringold also aid
that the whole oaje was brought
about by J. A. Ringold, a son of
hern.
Couldn't Drop Case
The solicitor then told of answer
ing the letter of M. D. Lane, telling
him that he could not drop the Baugh
am case, as the grand jury had already
presented the ease.
Following this Solicitor Aberne
thy told of a conversation with
Angus MoLean of Washington, re
lative to continuing the caw and tbat
he told him he could not do this
that ha would' have to ovine to trial.
Later McLean again telephoned him
in regard to the matter ami he fin
ally said, "I'll take the matter up
with K, A, Nunn, on'' of counol far
the RnfcldV' The soUoltuj- did
this and Mr. Nunn was sgreeable
to a continuance.
Mr. Rouse then told the solici
tor to go ahead and tell about coming
into court before the judge on the
opening day. He told of the judge's
charge; of his assertion that rich
men violate law without regard and
of his reference to speeding automo
biles. During the charge the sohci
tor told of the judge calling him down
in an abrupt manner for talking to
the clerk saying "gentlemen I don't
appreciate your disturbance of the
court." The solicitor said that he
then sat down until the charge- was
concluded and then came the calling
of the docket. "When the Baugham
case was reached," said the solici
tor, "Judge Carter first passed it
over, then went back and said 'what
i this case of Stuff vs Rauuhftm?
I then told him and he said, 'Is he
a white man?' I said yes sir, he then
said 'is: he a wealthy man?' 1 said I
don't know." "Oh yes, I see; this
is another one of those cases where
a wealthy man is in the case and try
ing to escape justice." The solici
tor then tcld of being fined fifty dol
lais for alleged contempt, of being
placed in the custody of the sheriff
and of being treated as any other
common criminal, even being re
fused an appeal to the Supreme
Court and of the judge telling the
sheriff to put him in jail if the fine
was not paid by 3 o'clock.
Mr. Abernethy said that it; was
not until the following dav that the
finding of the facts were read by
bim; that they were not read out
that day but that he .aw them on
the minutes.
'On Wednesday," said the solici
tor, "about 5:30, we were in the midst
of a murder trial, a very important
case, when Judge Carter abruptly
called a halt in the proceedings and
read statement one of'those respectful
requests". In this document the
judge handed the solicitor another
wallop. -This literally knocked the
JSJCftUWinder the solicitor, accord
mg'to the evfde!lic'eT an J fie was so
much worked up over it that he ask
ed for an adjournment fcr the day
which was granted. This document
was a request for a statement from
the solicitor for full details in the
Baugham ease.
At the time designated (Thursday
morning) by Judge Carter for Solici
tor Abernethy to make a statement,
the solicitor handed the judge a
"statement" which was to the effect
that the case was closed and that he
did not care to go further into it
at this time; that tho time, for ex
plaining had passed. According to
the witness the next incident occur
red on Friday when he announced
that ho was through with the docket
and a recess was taken until Satur
day morning.
Another Wallop!
On Saturday morning the court
adjourned sine die after which Judge
Carter . pulled out a memorandum
and ordered this spread on the min
utes this was a missive in which the
solicitor was severely criticized. Mr.
Abernethy's attorneys then objected
to this being spread upon tho minu tes'
if it contained anything relative to
Abernethy. The judge then ordered
a short recess in order to allow the
solicit or and his attorneys to consult
this "statement." After reading this
article of Judge Carter's and finding
that it spoke in very severe terms Off
the solicitor, he and his attorneys
made written protest against allow
ing it spread upon the court record.
According to the evidence however,
the judge's statement was ordered
on record and there it went, along;
with the protest of the solicitor and
a supplement by Judge Carter.
Statement Published
Solicitor Abernethy then told of
the publishing of these statements
in the New Bern Journal and the
News and Observer. He then jump
ed over to the subject of "liquor
cases" stating that Judge Carter
said Craven juries would net convict
"blind tigers" and sajd all who would
come in and submit, that 'prayer
for judgment would be continued
Tho solicitor said that the Craven
jail was cleaned out in, this manner
which, incidentally he thought was
a slack way of doing business
Afternoon Session
After a recess of an hoar and a
half for lunch, the investigating com
mittee resumed the inquiry. Solici
tor ('. L. Abernethy who had been on
the witness stand during the fore
noon, resumed his seat.
N. J. Rouse, of Kins ton, of counsel
for the solicitor, told him to recite
the facts why he refused to answer
Judge Carter's request for a state
ment of the Baugham cat and this
ha did,
, At this juncture, Judge Manning
Judge Manning the went into an
exhaustive inquiry in agard to the
oase of State vs. Baugftim and the
solicitor's attitude in this ease. Con
cluding this tack Jufiae Manning
then took up the statements which
the solicitor had gives out, desir
ing to know just when they were given
out. Next he wanted to know why
the solicitor didn't set down when
told to do so. To this question Ab
ernethy replied that if he had taken
a seat just when ordered to do so
he would have sat on the floor as
there were do chairs near at hand.
The Juris Was ftusv
Solicitor Abernethy was then asked
if he did not know the judge was
busy and that this wa the reason
he was asked to- sit down the wit
ness replied "No."
Next came a query 'as to the tele
phoning the Solicitor had done. A
list of names was presented to him
and he verified the assertion that he
had 'phoned to eaehlono of these.
Among these names Were Governor
Craig. Editor E. E. Rrittan of Ral
eigh, Judge Allen, MejLean of Wash
ington and otheis. Must why this
query a- to telephoning was made
wa not evident.
Back again to the subject of giving
out interviews to the newspapers
went Judge Manning in bis question
ing and desired to know just when
and how many interviews Solicitor
Abernethy gave oat. The solicitor
answered each of these questions to
the best of his ability. At this junc
ture Representative Stacy question
ed the solicitor in regard to whether
there was any cause for Judge Car
ter to think that ha Was in contempt
of court cn Monday? The witness
answered in the, negative. Follow
ing this Mr. Rouse tijad to the com
mittee the official record of the con
tempt ease. ':
Given No Chance
Mr. Hutchinson of the investigat
ing committee asked the solicitor
if Judge Carter gave him any oppor
tunity to explain tba-lleged contempt,
the witness replied that "He did
not."
Chairman Doughton then asked as
to the liquor eases handled by the
judge and the solicitoi repeated the
evidence given atjthe morning sess
ion and stated that he thought the
citizens of Craven'-county were hon
est and would onnviot a "tiger"
if there was evidence enough for such
and that .he xould "jot uphold Judge
Carter in his actiorrin regard to the
hiC&S-ht rtniliii -MStfSrfH
easSr of retailing.
A. D. . McLean
A. D. McLean of Washington took
the witness chair at 4:05 o'clock.
This witness is of counsel for James
H. Baugham the Washington youth
who stands charged with having
caused the death of James Ringold.
After giving a brief resume of the
accident, the fact that three young
people were with his client, the wit
ness told of having the case contin
ued the first time on account of the
inability of counsel to attend and of
another attempt to have it contin
ued from February to June. Mr
McLean Stated that the solicitor
told.him that this was a matter which
was up to the jedge. Later, after
explaining that the witnesses were
attending school. Mr. McLean suc
ceeded in getting Solicitor Abernethy
to see R. A. Nunn of counsel for plain
tiff and that they had. agreed for
a continuance and in view of this he
did not come over to New Bern. On
Wednesday, February 10th, he read
of the trouble between the judge
and the solicitor and at once wrote
to the judge explaining the -matter
and received from him an acknowledg
ement of this letter.
L. I. Moore
Larry I. Moore, of the law fii m
of Moore and Dunn, this oity, next
took the stand Mr. Moore stated
that he was one of James Baugham's
attorneys; that he knew very little
about the continuances as Mr. Wm
Dunn, Jr., attended to that part
of the work. After the first incident
in court, Mr. Moore came to the
conclusion that tliif was detrimental
to the interests of his client and that
he went to see Judge Carter in re
gard to the matter and asked him not
to let any occurence in court have
the influenoe of put ting young Baugh
am in an unfair light with the court .
Mr. -Moore then told of Solicitor
Abernethy telephoning to him after
being taken in custody and requesting
that he (Mr. Moore) come to the
Court House and that ho at once
did this and advised the solioitor
tbat the best thing be could do would
be to pay the fine.
Mr. Moore in continuing his evi
dence, told of Sheriff Lane bringing
Solicitor Abernethy'a cheek to the
Judge and of the latter refusing to
accept it and requiring the "cold
cash", which was . procured for him
by L. O. Daniels.
What Happened Saturday
In continuing his evidence, Mr.
Moore took up the proceedings on
Saturday morning when the famous
"defamatory statement" from Judge
Carter was spread upon the oourt.
His version of this was practically
identical with that gives In the fore
noon by Solicitor Abernethy him
self. At. tids juncture Judge Manning
iMited Mr. MfWt n. fi quMtlous
ROPER MACHINISTS
WON! GO BACK
Quit Work Two Weeks Ago
And Are Still Holding
Out
Sine the strike of the union
machinists employed at the local
shops of the John L. Roper Lumber
Company, about two weeks ago, the
work in the shops has been done by
machinists who were in the employ
of the company prior to the time of
the strike, and who are not members
of the un'on.
The strike was the result of the
officials issuing an order for the men
to work eleven hours per day for
ten hours pay. At that time the
machinists had been idle for some
time and it was thought they they
would be willing to resume their work
on these conditions, but such was
not the case. Judging from the pres
ent outlook they will remain out of
employment for some time unless
they seek work elsewhere, as the
officials of the company seem to be
firm in the stand which they have
taken in the matter. The union mei
also seem to be equally as determined
not to go to work under those con
ditions. after whioh Chairman Dunning ask
ed in regard to Abernethy's check to
Sheriff Lane.
D. E. Henderson
D. E. Henderson, another well
known local attorney, was one of the
attorneys who were present on the
opening day of court and was fortu
nate enough to hear the famous
"Rich man versus 'pore' white man
and negro charge." Mr. Henderson
told of this and of the subsequent
fining of Messrs. Eby and Howard
by Judge Carter and of the Judge's-
remarks about paying the fines "right
now" and of his "call down" after
they had paid their fines.
Continuing, Mr. Henderson told
of the calling of the docket and of
reaching the case of State vs. Baugh
am and of Judge Carter's action when
this was reached. (This account by
Mr. Henderson was about the same
as that of other witnesses testified.)
He then launched into a description
of Judge Carter's action in adjudging
the Solioitor in contempt , of the fin
ing of the court officer, and of the
scene when the fine was paid. Mr.
Henderson also stated that he asked
Judge Carter not to make an official
record of this and that Judge Carter
said that he would take the matter
under consideration and that he
(Henderson) later saw Solicitor Ab
ernethy and told him that he thought
he could get the judge to keep the
findings off of the court record.
"The next thing 1 knew," said the
witness, "the findings had been en
tered on the court's docket."
In referring to Judge Carter's
tone of voice and apparent anger
during the Abernethy incident, Mr.
Henderson stated that it was plain
that the judge was "warmed up"
going on down through the week the
witness, who was appearing in the
case of State vs, Jesse Creel, charged
with murder; stated that on Wed
nesday afternoon after the trial of
this case was begun, Judge Carter
called attention to a statement which
he had to read and he then read this
which was the request for the solici
tor to make a statement to the oourt
in regard to the Baugham case. Mr.
Henderson declared that this so frus
trated the solicitor that he asked
for an adjournment of court until
the following day and this was done.
Asked aa to what effect he thought
the reading of the statement by the
judge had on the Creel case, Mr. Hen
derson replied that it "had more
effect on the solicitor than on the
case."
The witness then told of the filing
of the statement by Judge Carter
on Saturday whioh "roasted" the
solicitoi aud of the subsequent filing
of a protest to the entrance of this on
the oourt records by Solioitor Aber
nethy and of the filing of the sup
plemental statement by Judge Carter
and of the entrance of the whole on
the records.
Judge Manning, in behalf of his
client, put Mr. Henderson through
a grilling cross-examination in which
the witness entirely re-hashed his
evidence at first given. Not once,
so far as was. disoernable did Judge
Manning shake the foundation of
any of the testimony.
Edward E. Bnttan
Edward E. Britten, editor of the
New and Observer, stated that he
received from R. A. Nunn, a state
ment written by Judge Carter and
signed by bin, this was received
near 1 o'clook. Said he met Mr.
Nunn on the street of Raleigh and
the communication was given to
him then, stating tbat it was filed
"this morning" (Saturday.) De
clared it would have been impossible
for the statement to have been mail
ed in New Ben after having bean
filed in oourt and to be ye reached,
WPWto by l Q'Olook.
GERMANS BURN
POLISH PROVINCE
IN RETALIATION
Suwalke Is Now Only A
Mass of Smoking Embers
and Ashes
CZAR'S MEN ACTIVE
Have Won First Move
Their Attempt On
Budapest
In
- a
Petrograd, March 25. The Ger
mans have burned Suwalki. capital
of the Polish province of the same
name, in retaliation for the Russians'
occupation of Memel. the war offioe
announced today. Word was brought
to Orodo by Russian aviators. Ger
man warships have bombarded unfor
tified Russian villages in the piovince
of Courtland, on the Baltic as a fui
ther act of revenge.
Win First Move
- - -4
London. Mareh 25. The Russians
have won their first move in the it
tempt against Budapest. They have
pushed through the western gap of
theDukla Pass and are intrenched
" , , . , ,,, ,
city of Bartfa, where a great battle is
in progress. The Russians are fight
ing desperately to capture the Lup-
kow,and Uszok Passes. The Russian
war office remains silent as to the dis
position of the army that invested
Przemysl, but has announced the cap
ture of a large amount of booty there.
ftgNftft French PlanR tfcfcrg
fParis, March 25. A French war
office statement answers assertions
made in American newspapers by
General Kriedrich Von Bernhardi
that the French plan of concentra
tion showed that France and Great
Britain had made more careful pre
parations to violate Belgium's neu
trality. The statement explainsjin
detail that when war was declared
the French army was concentrated
alon gthe Ft anco-Germa nt frontier,
and that the German invasion of
Belgium compelled the general staff
to change completely t he disposition
whioh had been arranged. I But for
this delay, it says, tho Germans
would never have been able to cross
the Mouse. ,
The question of the British army
taking the field was not considered,
thefwar ministry asserts, until after mt,r, an exclusive fetish paper pub
violation of Belgium's neutrality on Ughed in Raleigh, wilka interesting
August 5. to those who are interested in the
Itsconcentration was effected be- eradication of the cattle tick in Bast-
hind Maubeuge from August 14 to
24. Varicustorders are quoted tot "Destroying the cattle tick is not
show that the French army waslkeptl. tmH. but , demonstrated BaeL
sixfmiles from the frontier and or-
dered tolleave to thelGermans the re-
sponsibility for opening hostilities.
An order issued bythe nunisterof
wr "n Sust 4 u quoted as; read-
mg:H
Germany win auempt oy faise
erewmuiy wiuaiwiui . uy ""
a induce us .to violate Belgian
irality. It isstnotly forbidden,
news.
neutrality.
until further orders, for patrols or
even single soouhk crossftne one
or forlayiators to fly oye rBelgian
territory." Iafflftpi i
Not .until August 5, the statement
asserts, at the formal requestM the
Belgian government, did Frenoh
troops enter Belgium.
s
t t
t i iinnpu iiatpi
LanuKLN nuiLL r
FILES AN ANSWER
They Are Defendants in
Rather Sensational '
Case
-i :n. xj v. nr. TU. I
. n I , ' , 111 141111-11 v - ..,.
hatw v.t,P,ie filed answer to the
complaint against it by Mr. and Mrs
l erbert Chaffin in.which thoy ask for l"u"u" . .k. .
i- k .,m f artnnfMi n .hI We are not urging that this work
ground that they were ejected from
the hotel, insulted and humiliated by I
a. , j
the house detective. The hotel denies w' w 'Il,T,
that thev were mistreated and claim. "A 'ompbory without givfcg
that they left of their own accord PPfo hT t0 the
only after the detective had gone to q"t But there win never he a
their room and told Mr. Chafln that better time than right now to begin
he could not occupy it without regis- SWtUMntlng the public with Its im
torinrr portanoe and we urge that our rend-
-'" : 71 . T" rTTI jars lake p the matter in their respec-
ne re,u!,i , vrtiw loeiJitles.
n nt tne noiei, not Knowing wngm
he was when he entered the room
aid beins unable to get him to put
his name on the register, asked that
ha resrlster or leave the hostelry.
ohoee to do the latter, it is claimed,!
.iMw.uo-h h,. wkh not fiected .'M
Mr. ami Mr Chafln are prominent! Oro, the prosent ohampion, faced a
Birmingham people and their action
in filing suit some time ago caused
much interest here
John T. White, loeal agent for
the Southern Express Company, has
received instruction from the main
oQoe telling htm not to deliver any
package containing more than
quart of hWky after .fas. first
FORMER LEGISLA
j TOR IS IN JAIL
Erstwhile Representative
From Pitt County Oat
of Prison In Again
1 J. Nichols, at one time repre-
Lqnmtiri in the Legislature from Pitt
leouity and in the drug business a
Green viiie. who was doing six months
in the Leavenworth, K ansae, federal
prison for misuse of the mails, ms
arrested late Tuesday immediately
upon the expiration of his seateaor
for a similar offense in South Carolina
dating back five years.
The Leavenworth Times says Nich
ols, "one of the youngest members"
of the North Carolina General As
sembly at one time "and still a young
man," promises "a legal battle." He
was sent up from Oklahoma. He
claims that any person who owns a
United States patent has the oo neb
tut ion &l right to make, use and send
the same throughout the United
States and to license others to do so.
A Federal court in Oklahoma, how
ever, decided differently. Nichols w
strong in his contention that he is the
victim of a conspiracy and has enlist
ed the aid of Congressmen from Okla
homa and North Carolina in his be
half. He proposed to resist extradi
tion to South Carolina.
"He was engaged in Oklahoma in
the manufactuer and sale of a dome-
tie patent, and it was through sueb
"Tf ' , aA
sales the alleged violation occurred.
He claims his imprisonment is unjust
"He will also raise the constitu
tional question that a person, 'When
arrested and indicted, cannot be held
in default of bond for five years with
out trial. He is strong in his conten
tion that he has been treated unjust
ly" Nichols is known to numbers of
people here, who will remember the
one time legislator, a man of intel
lect ual ability and well-connected in
the section.
CATTLE TICK MUST
k BE ERADICATED
j So
Says the Progressive
Farmer In A Strong
The following clipping from this
f week's issue of the Progressive Far-
I era North Carolina.
M .j, hy tJxe charing of 350.-
qqo square miles, or an aroa equal
ln ,iae to flve average Southern States.
0nce ita if demonstrted in a
locJjiity it tpreads to adjoining opun-
ties, and in a few years wide areas
1 4re oleared and made-ready for the
I are cleared and made-ready for the
profitftble production of livestock,
I Bt ig j, not alone the iivetoek
farnwr tBat eradication work
inten(ed; for the average general
fsmer e,eryWhere in the South will
fom it tne mogt 8UDBtantial
neate. Why? Simply because my
f..m -nd vours. be we ootton farmers.
tobsiOCO hrmen. sugar farmers, or
truck growers, are not completely
equipped or operating most profita
bly unless we have at least enough
livestock to consume products that
would otherwise go to waste and con
vert them into meat, milk and but
ter. It is plain, too, that these animal
machines, in order to run to greatest
Ajj muit properiy fed and
Lared for and kept in good health.
I We believe tbat ticky oowa are not
cows well cared for, nor ean they be
I in IK) IWBl) oi wmw. v ww v
I- i .. a l l.l. tt it
a ... a . .
natxirally follows that such animals
cannot be making for us profits they
ntarted in counties where public
sentiment is not ready for it, and we
. , , . lal
I
GREAT BILLIARD CONTEST IS
He ON IN CH1CAOO
'hieaao. March 'U Alfred Di
fighting chanoe today to remain in
the running for the world's three-
cushion billiard obamptonsnip Mant
es in bis match last
William Huey of t'hioago,
paired today with C
Chicago Defeat
chances of retaining
one
!
Is only tne game
Juto uU of Sr
night with
I
-1
t mi