Page Two T H E T A R HU EL Saturday, December 8, 1928 . -itt rrr Leading Southern, College . Tri . "Weekly Newspaper Published three times weekly during the college year, and is the official newspaper of the Publications Union of the "University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N. C. Sub scription price, $2.00 local and $3.00 out of town, for the college year. Offices in the basement of Alumni Building. Walter Spearman George Ehrhart Marion Alexander ..: .:. Editor .... Mgr. Ed Bus. Mgr. EDITORIAL DEPARTMENT Glenn Holder " 1. Assistant Editor John Mebane . Assistant Editor Harrr Galland Assistant Editor Will Yarboreugh ............ Sports Editvr Reporters' M. Broadus H. T. Browne W. C. Dunn ; J. C. , Eagles J. P. Jones W A.' ! Sheltoii D. L. Wood C. B. McKethan J. C. Williams . E. 'Wilson G. M. Cohen B. G. Barber J; E. Dungan G. A: Kincaid Dick McGlehon J. Q. Mitchell " B. C. Moore K. C. Ramsay Linwood Harrell E. F. Yarborough H. H. Taylor E. H. Denning J. D. McNairy B. W. Hitton BUSINESS DEPARTMENT Executive Staff B. M. Parker . Assi, Bus. Mgr. H. N. Patterson ..... Collection Mgr. Gradon Pendergraph Circulation Mgr. T. R. Kirriker Asst. Col. Mgr. Advertising Staff . . , Leonard Lewis Milton. Cohen Harry Latta Sidney Brick Ben Aycock H. Jameson Kermit Wheary . . H, Merrell Saturday, December 8, 1928 On Prinking Deeply The recent heated discussion of student drinking at the University of Virginia and conduct at the Caro lina-Virginia football game is indie ative of the interest throughout the country in this problem and shows the pointed questions being put to our educational institutions' at the present time. Since the whole matter has been delved into and newly brought before the public, today's Carolina-Duke game will present both the critics . and the lauders of the University of North Carolina and unexcelled oppor tunity. to make investigations, col 1 lect circumstantial evidence, and spread abroad on the wings of rum or whatever their findings may war rant. Today we are on parade. Today the citizens and hence the taxpay ers of North Carolina will gather at Chapel Hill for the gala occasion of a football game and also to in spect their university and the con duct of its students. What will they see? Judging from previous football games, both here and elsewhere, we admit the possibility of certain too far-gone ; inebriates placing them- selves on public exhibition. The re sponsibility for this state of affairs is bandied back and forth between students and alumni. It is undoubt edly true that returning "old grads generously offer their imported . gin to undergraduates. Be that deplor able as it may, it is also true that generous - minded undergraduates share their. OrangeCounty corn with their older visitors. It works both ways and both ways end in a result detrimental to the University. Some convivial souls demand drink or two to warm their, college spirit on a cold December day doubtless they will continue, to de mand it; but if they must have their liquor let them, as least be gentle men enough to carry, it well. There is no excuse for any student so to fax forget the common , decencies as. to make an objectionable fool of him self before the crowds assembled to witness the football game. Drunken shining is not characteris tic . of Carolina students and" we do not want any such impression to be made today. Goal Posts Or Friendly Feeling Assuming to begin with that it is rank heresy even to consider the pos sibility of Carolina's not winning the game today, we nevertheless venture question on that possibility. Which is more important: to maintain a friendly .feeling, between wo great unversities fated to con tinue their existences situated with in twelve miles of each other or to ex hibit a childish attitude in scrambl ing around unimportant goal posts? Those who attended the Carolina- Virginia' game at Charlottesville will recall the dignified action of the Virginia men in ignoring the. impet uous goal rush of Carolina men led by several over-zealous alumni. One of those Virginia goal posts return ed to Carolina on the special train as a memento of very youtniul en thusiasm, a souvenir of the prep school way of looking at things. Today, .then, . if - Duke wins the game, let Carolina students remember the Virginia episode. Those who dis- approve of such a fracas over com monplace goal posts will see to jt that they are not involved . in any jscrap here. And those whoconsider - tbe taking of goal posts merely a. proper display, of school rah-rah- spirit -can certainly do nothing but of fer Duke our posts with compliments and on silver platter, if there ' happens to be one about. . " .' "No goal post is worth causing any unpleasantness whatsoever ,; between neighboring and friendly universi ties. ," - v J I Alumni Irresponsibility Conscientious alumni who attend the sessions of the General r Alumni Association of the University here . . j -. : - - - - - today will probably give the Graham Memorial Building a. wide berth in their ramblings., about the campus. A reminder of anf unfulfilled obligation is not a very pleasant thing-to face. The White Elephant of ' the Caro lina campus is a monument to the un reliability of the University alumni in general. Whenever any organi zation fails to meet an - honest obli- gation, a decided stigma is attached to every individual of the group con- stituting it. Thus the violation of their pledged word on the part ' of a number of alumni to pay their con tributions to the , Graham Memorial Fund has cast a decided reflection upon every alumnus of the Univer sity, ,' - ' . At present the entire Graham Memorial idea is in a state of som nolent decay. Splendid as were the ideals behind the original movement for a memorial to the memory of the most beloved president ; Carolina has ever had, it would have been far bet ter had they never been formulated than that thev should bear such fruit as the gaunt hull that, is term ed ; Graham , Memorial, seemingly doomed to sink into decrepitude un finished and unused instead of be coming the beautiful structure that would undoubtedly ' result were the project carried through to comple tion. " There is little likelihood of the Memorial ' Buil'ding being completed as long as the present attitude of, the alumni continues. The state will not complete it, the students are finan cially incapable of doing so, and only the alumni are -in a position to carry the nrooosition to a successful con clusion. The typical alumni attitude concerning the Memorial is "You pay your pledge and 111 pay mine." Everyone is waiting for the next fel low to do something, and as a result no one does anything.. -; A number of alumni have indicated their, willingness to pay their pledges if they are assured the building will be completed. This attitude is. the strongest s insurance that it will not be. completed. " ; We suppose there is littlevchance of the General Alumni Association developing a conscience and coming to active realization of its deplorable breach of honor. ; We don't like to think of becoming a member of any organization with a past record , of haying made such a major failure as the Alumni 'Association has of the Memorial plan, however. GLENN HOLDER R. M. Grumman represented the Jniversity at the meeting of the North Carolina Commission on Adult Illi teracy at Raleigh lasf night, at which a conference was considered to draw a comprehensive plan for the further eradification of this evil. Open Forum REVIEWER SPEAKS To the Editor of the Tar Heel: For some moments I have been staring at my typewriter with a con templative eye. At last I have de cided to buy a new one. But I con- not forbear before I part with my bat tered and honorable servant to indulge in a criticism of criticism of criticism (with apologies to H. L. Mencken) . And the Open Forum columns of this paper need nourishment, for they have' had a, lean and destitute look of late.";.;-. ' "l .V " In Thursday's issue of the Tar Heel in a letter entitled "The Reviewer is Criticized" Mr. Lionel! Abelson flays unmercifully the reviewer of The CaroJ-ina Magazine. His scourge has three - lashes satire, logic, and elo quence. And the greatest of these is eloquence. , Mr. Abelson is at his best in the sentence i "the phrase cries to heaven" You can almost see the phrase described stretching upward to the star-specked heights for aid But I must not dwell on minor points al though they may get -a rise out of me. ' v Mr. Abelson even picks out a num ber of descriptive terms, sets them in print, and lets them speak for them selves when; I am certain,-Mr. Abel son could speak much more eloquently for them. The author of "The Reviewer is Criticized" seems at a loss to under7 stand a statement which the reviewer made about a poem 4of Mr. McCone's. Mr. Abelson is justified in his wrath. When will reviewers stop insulting their readers by. writing things which the public cannot grasp? . But the writer of the previous letter treats the reviewer unkindly in one instance. He picks out all of the critic's poor phrases and doesn't mention a single good one I But, perhaps. Well, it may be that the reviewer's " light is hidden under a busheL A bushel of gross errors. , '. Mr. Abelson describes the fact that Mr, Mitchell, Mr. McCone and Mr. MacKellar are groping with no one making- an effort to see what they are trying to say. And he implies tliat thev magazine critic merely places a stumbling block in the path of these literary, somnambulists oyer which they incessantly trip rise again, and continue groping. Perhaps Mr. Abel son is right, v ; , john mebane. r EVERYTHING IS ROTTEN understand and can appreciate any type kind or style of writing. -However!, we must admit that Mr. Mac Kellar "Afternoon Sentences" were entii'ely beyond usl We saw abso lutely no art in it, no redeeming feature of ' beauty, realism, or dis cription. Mr. Abelson in his article suggested that Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Mac Kellar and Mr. McCone were groping after something. It is our plea that they do their groping somewhere in private where . they may immediately consign the results of their groping to the .most immediate waste basket instead of scattering waste on us as we trustingly follow .. them - in this murky path that leads to the perfec tion of some Art. Why in the devil canjt they forget Jim Tully, E dgar Lee Masters, Carl Sandburg and Mr. Van Vechten for a while and produce something they know about, some thing that is spontaneous, something that is an expression of themselves or their lives and something that will appeal to a student body that is en tirely ignorant of this wonderful ex pression of art that the Carolina Magazine has been sloughing off on the student, body; for the last several years. Why. not have something some where near worthy ' of criticism be fore we learn, how to criticize. Why in the,, world don't aw, hell. Anyway it must be awfully gratifyr ing to the editor to have so much at tention paid the magazine. - J. 1 B. B. '32 LECTURE SYSTEM INADEQUATE Editor of the Tar Heel: We were very much interested to see the article entitled "The, Reviewer is Criticized" in last Thursday's Tar Heel. With a great deal of the sen timents Mr. Abelson expressed, we agree heartily but with a larger num ber, we disagree as heartily. : Certainly, our literary and dramatic criticism, if we may dignify it by that name, is t exceedingly poor and super ficial. It is even, if possible, worse than most college criticism. Our col lege critics seem to firmly believe that the first three ' essentials in a good criticism must be: vague and wilted witticisms, sophmoric super ficiality, and a total disregard of the literary organ itself and of its - con tent. .It. is our opinion that it would be very hard to find" a college maga zine which misses so utterly the point of being a literary organ, as does the Carolina Magazine. We wonder how far we would be missing the truth when we hint that Editor John Mar shall uses just about any and every piece of copy contributed? We firm ly believe that if . any one but the eight or nine regular writers, (who by the way are all regular contribu tors to the other literary organs on the campus) were to, submit a con tribution to the magazine, his article would , be accepted with a gasp .of astonishment and a hurrid outpouring of thanks before any attention what soever were paid to its content. ' A word about the contents of the last issue of the Carolina Magazine. The young and promising scribes -of this University seem to have absorb ed the idea that to be a good writer, one must be a sort of cross (if one could imagine such a 'thing) between Knut II am sum and Carl Sandburg with a little of Jim Tully and Alfred Greytemborg thrown in perhaps. Their articles are merely a soiled car bon copy of those great writer's works without their redeeming features of beauty, originality and sincerity. When Joe Mitchell atttempts realism in his ""Tobacco Market" his writing is about as. sincere as Emily Post en couraging a back to nature movement or a Carolina man , discussing the merits of Duke University. However, we thought his article was the least worst of the bunch. We thought Buck MacKellar's contributions were per haps: the worst rot and inexcusable muck ever perpetuated on an un suspecting and well-meaning student body. We pride ourselves that we Editor of the Tar Heel: :' There are any number of reforms, improvements, and changes . . in general needed in the v University. Many have already been discussed, but I . think one of the most pressing needs is a change in the relationship now , existing between' the faculty and student body. " ' , . ' . ' . This change should begin in the class room. , There should be preval ent a more friendly-atmosphere. If every member of a class, and the in structor could feel that every, person in. the, room was a personal friend, I believe it would cause the entire class to get more out of the course, and at the same time enable the instructor to make the subject clearer. A class might be conducted similar to an open forum discussion. . The in structor would act as chairman and do most of the talking, but every member of the class should feel" free to ask questions upon any doubtful point or to bring out any new point which might help the discussion. In addition, the instructor should ask questions to the students. This will stimulate interest and keep them pay ing attention. The. lecture system is inadequate in many respects. Some instructors lecture a whole period with half the class bored to death and getting no thing whatever; out of his talk. In taking a course of this type, a stu dent is, wasting time. Of course there are some courses that could hardly be taught any other way, but it seems to me that some changes could be made so that the student would get more out of the courses. My proposed, method is. not going to work as long as the majority of the, students retain their present at titude. A number, of tudents in every class have the idea that every time anyone asks a question, he is trying to "boot" his instructor. If these stu dents will wake up long enough to ask a few" intelligent questions, they will be greatly benefitted. I realize that this is a rather hazy sketch and that my plan will not work in all , classes, but I believe some changes can be made that will greatly benefit both student and instructor. I hope some of the -more intelligent ijtudents ' will give the matter some serious thought, and maybe some suc cessful plan can be worked out. Willis Wichard. Executive Committee Takes Action on Six Disciplinary Cases The Executive Committee of the faculty reports the following cases of discipline . which have come before it during . the fall term. It is the plan of, the Committee in . the future to publish the facts in, each case imme diately after action is taken. . ' Case No. 1 Irregularity , in French 4 quiz. Suspended from November '8 till remainder of fall term with privilege of re-admission on probation at opening of winter, term. : . 1 Case No. 2 Same as above. Case No, 3 For , drunkenness at South Carolina , game. . Student was already on probation for drinking in summer term. Suspended on No vember 15 until opening of fall term, 1929. As a condition of re-entrance at this time student must appear be fore the Committee and show that he has not been guilty of drinking in the interval. Case No. 4 Irregularity in Com merce 22, quiz. Student had been charged with cheating during the year 1925-26 and left the University without facing the charge. After two years he was allowed to re-enter on strict disciplinary probation in the fall of 1927. Dismissed from the University. Case No 5 Student re-admitted in Fall on strict conduct probation. Vio lated his probation. Dismissed from the University. ; Case . No. 6 For falsification in connection with eligibility for Fresh man athletics. Dismissed from the University. Lutheran Pastor To Preach Here Mr. Quincey O. Lyerly has been designated by the North Carolina Sy nod of the Lutheran church as the pastor, to preach a sermon to be given in Gerrard .Hall tomorrow, morning for the local Lutherans. The Student Lutheran Society and Dr. C. F. Vilbrandt are sponsoring the appearance of famous and skill ed speakers on the Hill to preach ser mons of interest to students, and have enlisted the aid of the- N. C. Synod in their work. LOST. " LOST Phi Alpha fraternity pin. Fender please return to 117 E. Rose mary St. Reward. DR. R. R. CLARK Dentist Orer Bank of Chapel Hill Phone 6251 DID YOU KNOW That people judged you by your shoes That people saw your shoes first . That good shoes make, a good impression That our shoe repairing 'can't be beat Because we use expert workmen only. And only the best obtainable materials ? UNIVERSITY 5 SHOE KHOP I it Monday rJ-r jr' k W ERICH VON STROHEIM -m- 66 THE WEDDING MARCH" with FAY WARD Just another, woman. This trusting, tender, beau . . tiful girl. Glittering, handsome, unscrupu lous, a scion of Vienna society, he plays i on the heart of the beautiful child-woman ' with expert deftness. A wonderful love. Added PATHE NEWS Now Showing ; t r : "ME GANGSTERS" ; ' ; . 11 5'' " " ' And Cat to Ofde ESTABCISHEP ENGLrSKNIVERSITY STYLES, TAieORErJvaWOUTHFUL CHARTS SOLYTJJSXtNGUISHED Suits 20 6vre4te 5 '. 0 i.-VC ' I of Chapel Hill The character of tho suits' and overcoats tailored by Charter Houso will earn your most, sincere liking. PRITCHARD-PATTERSON 1C vjuucian uuiiiuers l iTili-i-, ..L ,. "''l1'"1 . P' I - - , "F in rr;i i rnnii--r--iii(ii m ,

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view