Focus 0
The New Traffic Law Still reader's retort
n
Leaves Way For Injustices
f udenr s mqivic
On
1 he Daily Tar Heel erred in
its recent evaluation of the student
Legislature's new law broadening
the powers of the Traffic Commit
tee. We still maintain that this law,
giving the student Traffic Com
mittee power to punish "excess
ive' miffic violators,' was a mis
take. Iut oik- of our reasons was
based on somewhat less than the
complete facts.
Legislators, we held. ;ave too
wide power rant Jo the Traflic
Committee when they left it to
the committee to decide just who
were "flagrant" traffic violators.
However, as student ,!o eminent
officials have pointed out. the
Traffic Committee's by-laws in
cludiii'4 their definition of "Jla-
grant" ol lenders is subject to
legislative approval.
However, our other objection
remains, and it is strong and valid.
It is unfair for any student to suf
fer punishment twice for the same
offenses, which is precisely what
will occur under this law.
Student violators will pay fines
to Chapel Hill .rnd also be subject
to punishment by a student group
for the very same offenses. What
kind of justice is that?
The answer to ihe student car
.problem ultimately will be some
plan of limitation ol student cars
either by the trustees or students,
themselves.
We'd prefer to see students set
up their own limitations, if they
must come. And the signs that
trustees will take firmer action on
auto than students are already evi
dent. Self-limitation of student cars
would require a bolder and braver
course than student government
and its President are following
now. Hut, in the long run, it
would stave more drastic trustee
action.
An Obligation For Fairness
The housing problems of our
brother institution in Raleigh may
not be cause, for everyday concern
by Chapel Hill students. But
when one group is treated with
favoritism and shoved in ahead of
272 other students, few can re
main uninterested.
It all started when married stu
dents in housing units controlled
by the State College Athletic De
partment found they would have
to move to other quarters. The
students happened to be athletes,
and they were assigned to the
special project (National Youth
Administration apartments) by
athletic officials.
The move was necessitated by
construction of an intramural
field, so college officials felt a
"moral obligation?! tb provide the
six married athletes with hcjusinj.
- By-passingf a .n 7-studentj wait-.
A Colossal Find: I :i Q
ing list, the six athletes are being
moved into Yetville, the colleges'
housing unit for married students.
Yetville residents are now seek
ing legal 'advice because they feel
the athletes were given preferred
treatment. -
Th Athletic. Department fixed
up the NYA project to house the
six married athletes. Of 12 units,
only six were occupied. Yet no
other married nonathletes were in
formed of the vacancies or invited
to live 111 the Athletic Department-controlled
NYA develop
ment. State College also has a "moral
obligation" to the 272 students 011
Yctville's waiting list, as the stu
dent : newspaper- there so aptly
pointed, out. !
But 'the college has no particu
lar obi igation , (to a- special group 1
jfajj ! jvas provide!; housing by . the
Athletic; .Department,1-'!".."' ; '
,Mi t .,:
i I
The Dead Sea Scrolls
It was "rather early in the spring"
of 1947 that a Bedouin boy, Muham
med the Wolf by name, made the co
lossal discovery of modern Biblical
archeology as be tended sheep on the
Western rim of the Dead Sea.
The repercussions of his find al
most two dozen caves lined with manuscript-filled
jars are just now center
ing their full impact on the West
ern world, particularly the world of
Christianity and Judaism.
Edmund Wilson, who is at home in
any critical job from Menander to
Maeterlinck, from archeology to episte
mology, writes about the so-called Dead
Sea Scrolls in a recent book. The book
is a slight elaboration on a lengthy
article for The New Yorker magazine
of May 14, 1955.
Almost 10 years after the first dis
covery, the first general impact is be
ginning to be felt. At first only a dedi
cated Metropolitan monk (now retired
in New Jersey on the fat reward of
his discovery) realized the value of the
scrolls; he had a devil of a time con
vincing his fellow clerics and the
university-connected Biblical scholars
to take an interest.
The dramatic discovery coming, as
it dd, at the height of Arab-Jewish hos
tilities in 1947; the intrigue and diffi
culty of getting the Scrolls to scholars
who knew and felt their explosive-value,
is enough. What lies beyond in impli
cations for the Biblical faiths promises
drama-extraordinary as the scrolls
undergo exegesis.
Briefly, here is what Wilson found:
The uniqueness of Christ as the
Christian Messiah may be brought
again into question. Wilson reports
this, knowing that "one of the worst
tendencies of insensitive modern scho
larship (is its tendency) to account for
everything in the Gospels in terms of
analogies and precedents." The Es
senes a Dead Sea waste-land sect or
monastic order, originally held the
scrolls; they probably hid them in the
caves as Roman legionaires invaded.
The Doily Tar Heel
The official student publication of the
Publications Board 01 the University of
North Carolina, where it is published
daily except Monday and examination
and vacation periods and summer terms.
Entered as second class matter in ''the
post office in Chapel Hill, N. C., under
the Act of March 8, 187?. Subscription
rates; mailed, $4 per year, $2.50 a se
mester; delivered, $6 a year, $3.50 a seme-ter.
Editors LOUIS KRAAIl, ED YODEIi
The; Esenes record in some of, the
scrolls a figure who partakes of sev
eral key Messianic qualities-the same
Messianic qualities as Jesus.
Wilson reports that several Chris
tian scholars assigned to these manu
scripts (several hundred years older
than any Biblical manuscripts we had
before) have balked, balked in the face
of serious questions-for their own re
ligious commitments. This has hap
pened on both Judaic and Christian
sides, since beyond the question of
Christ's uniqueness there is the ques
tion of the legitimacy of the Masoretic
scriptures. And, as one of the scholars
told Wilson, "we now realize that there
was much more variety and flexibility
in Judaism than had ever been sup
posed." Several scholars have even specu
lated that the vacant period of Jesus's
life, heretofore filled only by conjec
ture, may have been lived in the Es
sene order.
The whole business is, needless to
say, complicated to a layman who
makes no claims as a Biblical scholar.
Wilon's lengthy and resplendent es
say doesn't argue any point except
that the work ought to proceed as fast
as possible. Wilson writes as, un pur
savant, without theological compunc
tions, without being pushed or res
trained by personal theories or feel
ings. - :
But he is disturbed that the possi
bilities of the scroll discovery have
thus far appeared only in scholarly
writings; for the laiety and the gen
eral public there are only magazine and
newspaper distillations. If the Jewish
scriptures; the uniqueness of Christ;
and the asumptions of the "liberal"
Christian scholars that the Gospels had
a non-organic growth stand at stake,
that is, for Wilson, all the more reason
why research should continue speedily
with findings being laid bare in intelli
gible terms to the waiting world.
At the end of one of T. S. Eliot's es
says, he claims that Irving Babbitt
"knew too much" about the world's
literatures and religions to go beyond
his humanism into religious faith.
Granted, a sweeping landscape view of
religious faiths, a vague relativity mak
ing no ultimate assumptions the ulti
mate rule, is often an immature stage
in the development of faith. But it is
hard to see how a faith can offer com
fort if its channels are closed to new
blood. It is hard to see how the scholars
who won't push for exegesis of the
Dead Sea Scrolls can live with them
selves religiouslyno matter how much
lies at stake for their faiths. E. "V.
I -
urop iraaiTioii,'
Yor Mine
Editors:
First, let me say that Tm not
a Southerner. I've .spent most of .
my life in California and the Pa
cific areas.
However, in the last year or
so, with my father (a naval offi
cer) stationed in Charleston, S.
C, and me attending a' Southern
university, I've been able to ob
serve, to a slight degree, on hand
some of the conditions I had
heard so much about. I wasn't
sure what to expect.
I had been led to believe, on
ihe one hand, in "Southern Hos
pitality," but, on the other hand,
was the picture of a haughty
proud people who still evaluated
others in terms of grandparents,
etc. So I welcomed the chance to
sees what it was really like .for
myself as much as possible. How
ever, let me state that I did not
come with an altogether . un
biased mind, for I have lived
around people of many different
races and somehow the idea of
segregation didn't strike me too
well. -; j ' ,
FOUND BOTH
Well, I found both the friend
liness and' the haughtiness, both
the narrow and the broad mind
ed. From what I've been able to
see the last few months here at
Carolina talking with various
students, I find that most of them
are sincerely attempting to look
at the segregation problem ob
jectively with a broad mind. But,
unfortunately, most of the loud
talking and attracting of atten
tion seems to be done by a small
minority of arrogant, narrow
minded fanatics.
Some of the letters I've read
are of such an arrogant and nar
row nature (e.g. Mr. Staton's in
the Saturday Daily Tar Heel) that
it is easy to see why ill-feeling
against Southerners has been
aroused in other sections of the
country. It is always the loud ;
minority which are heard and
giye a bad reputation. I don't
pretend to be able to offer aliy
solution to your (the South's)
problem, but I do think that the
less, arrogance and narrow pre
judice, the better the outcome
will be.
TO STATON
To you, Mr. Staton, I would
like to ask: Just who in the hell
do you think you are? Exactly
'what sort of God-endowed superi
orities do you possess which
justify your presumptuoushess?
There are a lot of peopfe in this
world, Mr. Staton, and you had
better get used to the fact that
you're one of them, and you're
going to have to live with them
for quite a while. ,
Let me ask you what's so ter
rible, so shocking, about the fact
that an undergraduate Negro
lives on the campus? Just forget
tradition for a moment, and look
at it with an open mind; are such
'Ready To Go To TRe Basketball Game, Toots?'
. "'!
Y4nl ill IDs ff ;
- W ' i 1
CONVERSATION PIECE
Time For President Fowler
To., Work On New Cut Rule
By Bill Ragsdale
' I'm very proud of this school. It is the kind
of university that I will want my sons to go to.
Perhaps the main reason for my "pride in this
place is that we are treated with more than the
usual amount of respect that is given a student '
body by the faculty and administration.
'We have been accorded this respect because in:
times past we have deserved it; we have acted wise
ly and consistently with the administration, and
have had a voice in those matters that concerned
us. Recently I.see this pride I have is in jeopardy!
Other schools, and those close to us, are pulling
ahead of us in areas in which we should be expect
ed to take a lead.
EXAMPLE ' , -'jb
An example of what I write of is the cut rule'.
As most of you krmw, Duke has established a sys
tem of unlimited cuts for juniors and seniors.
State College has the same arrangement, plus a
provision that enables seniors to choose whether or
not they, will take the finals in their various courses.
State is a different kind of school from UNC; in
our. mo'e liberal courses a final exam is perhaps
more of a necessity than it is under their engineer
ing curiculum. But we have as much right to free
dom of choice in class attendance as anyone.
This cut system we have came into effect a
little over a year ago. There was a big furor be
cause some professors were allowing any number
of cuts and other p.ofessors weren't giving any, so
it was requested that some standardization' be
brought about. In response to this three professors
C. C. Carter, F. M. Duffey and II. R Totten
met and came ujp with the system that we 'have
now, justifying it by saying, ."Regular attendance ,
at class is a student obligation . . . an obligation
to the student himself and the State of North Caro
lina." . - ;. . ; ' . " b ;-
Sometime before long this system is going to
comeup for review, and it is at that time that. we
should get rid of it; obviously if we don't then it'll,
be ; around foir years to come.
WASTE TIME
, No one neither the ; professors that have to
waste time keeping track, of attendences, nor the
students who are bound by the restriction and who
are made to look childish by it, nor the personnel
that have to process the slips and cards is in favor
of the regulation, and no one is particularly . slow
about voicing his disapproval.
I have mentioned my reason for disliking the
rule. It makes us look childish. That is not why
we are here; if we are here to learn responsibility,
then let us learn it, and those of us who don't
learn it, those of us that don't come to class enough
to keep up with why the class is .presented, can
fail. But let us make the decision; let's don't have ,
it dropped down to us. To have that happen would
be rediculous and an admission of a willingness to
be regulated and looked after. -
FOR FOWLER
This is a time for Don Fowler to do something.
We elected, him to be our spokesman, to plead our
case before 'the administration, and in this he has
a perfect chance to do something positive and con
structive which wil save a lot of people a lot of
trouble, give us more self-respect as students by
putting us more on our own, reassert the powers
of student government for the first time in too
long a time, and keep us, as a student body, pro
gressing at the same rate as other schools around
here.:. -v ' '
Let us hope he gets on the stick.
dire consequences in store? Will
we all catch some horrible ail
ment? Tell me, I'd like to know.
I've gone to school with Negroes,
Mexicans, Filipinos, Hawaiians,
Chinese, etc., and I've had a lot
of friends among them, so your
shouting at. the mouth doesn't
show me much.
You mean to say you attended
an attraction which featured a
Negro? I'm astounded. I was tin
der the impression that the sight
of one in the same room would
cause immediate disorders, due
to some allergy or something.
This hints at hypocracy, Mr. Sta
ton. GUAM
I would like to say a little
about a small island in the Pa
cific called Guam where I spent
11 months and attended my .sen
ior year in high school. Of an at
tendance of some 1800 students,
' I was a member of'the stateside
minority which constituted about
four percent of the whole stu
dent body. Yet, need I say who
created the most trouble, the
most friction, need I say who did
the most discriminating?
One begins to wonder if with
all our civilization and progress,
we haven't missed something es
sential, if we haven't disregarded
something our country was orig
inally founded on. Some of the
sweetest, most sincere and con
siderate people I've ever met
were some of those native t stu
dents. They might have been
simple and native, but they were
honest, and they put a, true value
on other human beings. And then
a girl from Virginia I knew there
said to me, "I just can't stand to
be near them (the natives) of
touch them." How incredibly
warped some people's sense of
values can get.
Yes, Mr. Clement, and you Mr.
Staton, you are still living in the
South, and you are still living ,
together; as human beings in a j
f ree country. I am , proud of . how . . ,
Carolina on the whole has acted
in the present situation, proud
that there are enough intelligent,
mature, considerate individuals
here so that a disgrace similar to
the Alabama incident wasn't able
to occur.
John Underwood
Thinks Desegregation
1,
Will Start At College
Editors:
I'm from South Carolina and
although I'm not in favor of the
stand my state has taken on the
segregation issue, I'm still proud
of my hailing place.
People, let's wake up and face
the future: It's an obvious fact
that the Old South is on the way
out, and a new South of equality
and justice for all is on the way.
You can't treat a man like dirt
just because he isn't the same
color that you are. Look at the
progress that Negroes have made
in the last hundred years. It's not
amazing. It's the natural thing
for a man to do, to try to better
not only himself but also the
world in which he lives.
Th e N
evs
(This is'ihe first of a serie
by Pi Sigma Alpha fraternity 0n '1
current national political de ' '
(Pi Sigma Alpha is the '
Jvonor society vHth chapters in 1 -The
principal purpose of the tJ"
greater interest in political sckn'
and public affairs, in general r'k'
Every fourth year thou! T
examine the process of nominating
President of the United States if
quently depicted as "only one h
from the Presidency. Such re-exam
ten produced criticisms levelled ath'
nating procedure and our Electoral
of choosing fsom the nominees U"
Both procedures have been'de-v
democratic, unwieldly and obsolete
suits have been declared potential''
ative of the people, yet in a century' !
no movement to reconstruct the
enjoyed a significant following.
Since the nominating procedure i
precedes the election p.occss, this
focus attention of a few pertinent qj.
have arisen concerning the existing
ination. ':
PROBLEMS -
First, an understanding of the prjb J
nominating process requires some IT
of the nature and organization of poi"
in the United States. The most strife,
American political parties is that thepr
highly organized national machines. Tv
fact, distinctly local in texture and ou:
Our 1 constitutional provisions and rl"
islation have left most of the legal cor,:
tions in the' hands of the forty-eight ?''
states, in turn have left the mechanics ol
ing virtually in the hands of the parties
ural result is that elections and party c.r:
Widely from state to state, being reo;n
observe certain Constitutional guaranty
dividuals.
So party organization is to a high de?,
mous, and enough flexibility exists to
"loose" organization even at the local k
parties then, being loosely federated frr-m
to the national level, are subject to L::'
heirarchical control. Ihey are common';
as "decentralized".
PARTY SETUP
Many voters, "not to mention million: f
voters, are unaware of the nature of local
1
party organizations and hence unaware of ii
,b 'which 4 the opportunity for pardci?.!
are inclined to be suspicious and ready L
p1 opxkals .for ref ornL They tend to forge! l
'gates1 to a' natidnaT convention are almost r
ly ebmmitteed to local interests.
f;fj These - local commitments give us a
wherein we find from 1,000 to 14.000 dc
each partys convention, representing an 1
limited range of local interests and c.r
the support of many candidates (at rJ. '
ballot). But most convention delegates, I
bitious and enterprising politicians, will
the state leadership, normally headed by :
ernor, especially if his term is not expl::r;
will they support a national faction ins
position to their state organizations. Tit
which exists, if any, involves a lack 0! nr.
resentation.
So from an extensive list of "favors
national party convention must selects;
who will prove satisfactory to a sufk:rt
of local pressures to secure the nornm
ed by similar considerations, the copv
draw up a platform. The problem and tLe
therefore, of the party convention is to a
tent that of reconciling divergent ir.urc
der to select a single candidate and e
single statement of principles.
UNITY fe
Unity must be found in diversity. T.
difficult one, but (if the e is an absence,
resentative principle at the party con
principally a result of the apathy o.
voters. People who fail to appreciate or
fully the necessity for parties and the
perform all too often neglect to partic-j
procedure -most important to repre-
mocracy. ,.. .
However, it should be recognized---nothing
sacrosanct about our Preser'lr.. ;
nominating the President and Vice -
Hped. it ran hnasr neither of Consat-"
ion nor tacit recognition, ivior to
u-j ife pnndidates D) .
Integration can be accomplish
ed not over night, but over a
period of years, and will have
to start at the college level and
gradually be brought into the caucus, and the candidates were '
high schools and, later, grade
schools.
party had nominated its Candida
method. Rather they were chosen
bv 11 -
gener
TO STATON
In reference to the letter of
Mr. Bob Staton: He seems to be
not only narrow minded and de
cadent, but also bigoted in his
thinking. Mr. Staton should look
at himself. 1 .
I too would like to see a poll
concerning the segregation issue.
I would like to see the poll taken
on this campus. I don't think that
the majority of the students en
rolled in the University are the
narrow-minded prejudiced peo
ple that some seem to think
them. I think that we are people
who believe that live and let live
is not enough, but who adhere to
the principle of livev and help
live.
W. D. Andrews
.1.
rapport with the legislative brancn.
The development has been an
has even been suggested that urd: .
convention has contributed to the
the somewhat unique Presidential
tnPtif Tht rlnim here is that. D '
tion-by-caucus method been retaine f
have witnessed the emergence of a .-;
ment more akin to the English ParhJi:
tem in which there would be greater
bility.
CONSIDERATIONS
tv-u -
While such a possibility remains, -
ignores certain important con
Kn fn Viof ovPfiitil'P K n'-'l
me--'
leoislafivp hrnnrhr another i U1J '..
- ' - tron
or not, there has survived a ' p
favor of the doctrine of sepcration ?
gardless of the possible value t(i ,
the convention system as it has
- ,.i-.,-.!iln J1-
seemed to many tnai mtic - u
v Vi the
wildering means to accompli"
election of the President. j,y
Some who have been distress
that both our major parties J,C , p frrv-
nur f - t Virt intprests of tf ' J,
pear to work for the interest
have suggested party realignmen
. .-i a fpntrai"
,ent t
organization and increased par? u