Thursday. Hay 9, ise3
Jay Lacklen
THE DAILY TAR HEEL
(tar
"DeM9t Work
n
-
75 Ycsrt o IMIiartsI Frecdosi
Wayne Hurder, Editor
Donald Va!ton, Business Manager
mmm
HP
ark
W
arrant SG Action
UNC's Student Government is
an unique position of being able
to take a position of leadership
in the University community and
Chapel Hill and Carrboro.
The University Administration
has decided not to seek an in
junction against Orange County
Board of Commissioners' decision
to allow a trailer park to expand,
threatening the purity of the area's
water supply.
The University cannot seek an
injunction against the trailer park
because it is an agent of the state
and therefore barred from taking
such action.
The Chapel Hill Board of
Aldermen is being petitioned to
seek an injunction. In addition, Stu
dent Government, through vice
president Charlie Mercer, has ex
pressed an interest in stopping the
trailer park expansion whose
sewage may pour into the Universi
ty owned lake which supplies the
campus, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro
with water.
. Hopefully the Chapel Hill Board
of Aldermen will realize their
responsibility to the community
and seek the injunction. However,
should they ignore the problem,
just as the county board of com
missioners has, Student Govern
ment should 'jump into frayand
try to prevent the expansion. '
Clark, Senators 9 Talks
Give Clue To Riots
What causes the riots and
disregard for law that has been
prevalent in the nation in the past
couple of years?
The speech of U.S. Attorney
General Ramsey Clark and the
speeches of several U.S. Senators
Tuesday give a good clue.
The law has to deal with
change, "the fundamental fact of
our time," Clark told UNC law
students. The law has' to deal with
the world as it is now, he added.
About the same time i n
Washington, D.C. several Senators
were urging the President to issue
an executive order to stop the Poor
People's March from entering
Washington because of a fear of
violence.
TTiey were seeking to stop a
protest being undertaken by the
Southern Christian Leadership
Conference as an answer to the
violent protest of riots in the city.
The march is heading to
Washington to let the lawmakers
up there know that poor people
in the U.S., black, red, and Mexican-American,
want a change in
their condition.
And so . how do the lawmakers
face this request for change, this
"fundamental fact of our time?"
Instead of even considering the
The Daily Tar Heel is pub
lished by tie UnrraAtypf
North Carolina Student Publi
cations Board, daily except
Mondays, examinations periods
and vacations.
Offices are on the second
iloor of Graham Memorial.
Telephone mimbers: editorial,
sports, jicws 523-1011; bus
iness, circulation, advertising
933-1163. Address: Box 1080,
Chapel Ilill, N. C, 27514.
Second class postage paid at
U.S. Post Office la Chapel Hill,
N. C.
Subscription rates: - $9 per
year; $5 per semester.
Terry Gingras, Managing Editor
Rebel Good, News Editor
Shari Willis, Features Editor
Dale Gibson, Sports Editor
Jos Sanders, Associate Editors
Dick Levy
Kermit Buckner, Jr, Advertising Manager
Expansion
It would be ironic for Student
Government to step in and try to
help the town community which
has so often seemed to be ignoring
the students' needs at best, and
trying to rob them at worst, but
in this case the action would be
warranted.
The thought of one out-of every
three of the 60 septic tanks break
ing down (one in three is normal
breakdown rate for them) and par
ing their sewage into the Universi
ty water supply is not pleasant.
Health experts have warned that
the water purification system is
inefficient in removing unsanitary
parasites from the water and that
there is the possible danger of long
term ingestion of chemical
detergents in the water. All of
which adds up to the fact that
something should be done to pre
vent the addition of 42 trailers in
the 15 acre area.
. . . If the town is unwilling to face
its responsibility Student Govern
ment, as the representative of
about 14,000 students who use the
water, should ' act. Such an action
would do a lot for a student govern
ment whose own image has com
monly been characterized as one
of irresponsibility. In this case,
' .'they would be showing themselves
much more responsible than-either
the county or city government.
type of change that is needed or,
how change is to be brought about,'
these people refuse to face the re
quest for change.
One of them, John McClellan,
from a state which should be sen
ding a large contingent of
marchers, Arkansas, speaks of
alerting the city of the danger as
if a horde of barbarians from Asia
were about to invade Rome, when
instead some non-violent marchers
are going tto the city to present
their grievances to the govern
ment. The marchers are selecting a
mode of expression which is in
agreement with the provisions of
the U.S. Constitution and are being
met by opposition from some of
the most powerful persons within
the government established by that
Constitution.
For a poor person seeking
change in a way which he thinks .
is in accordance with the con
stitution and which is non-violent
to have his methods rejected by
the establishment from which he
seeks a change can only be very
frustrating.
Before he can expect any
change this poor person realizes
that he must communicate to those
in power the need for a change.
So what is he to do when con
stitutional, non-violent methods of
communication are rejected. He
must try to communicate his needs
in some other manner. Some
militants have suggested rioting as
that other manner. We don't like
it. We prefer the method being
used by .the SCLC. But we hope
that those persons in Washington
: will realize what they are doing
when they asked that com
munications with the poor be shut
off. We hope they will realize that
they are doing as much to en
courage rioting as any street cor
ner militant.
; The Scolastic Aptitude Test and the
Graduate Record Exam may one day
lose their prominence as college and
graduate school selection tools. They
have already begun to lose their
prestige.
The improvement of the system, or
"There . on l. (Q I 0 courst aewa-C roigh-f-
-Wkr3 -,n 4hJr . oion Chanel ;', wx-fe
x U4 6o i'4 f?V-- aA
walfe -erf orc I ywJy
TVl4 does IfV PKf I Vn X Out ctcy cenf
Uiny -ty ;J ;3 jrv ? ne
Dorm K
Coeds Adult?
To The Editor:
Again and again the forces of farce
fere at work. Examples of same follow:
, A. In an (unnamed) women's dorm,
the clocks are 5 minutes fast, and time
is calculated on'fthat'ftasas;-;;.' -if;
k i the same dorm, the light
are left on for a half ihour after dosing,
which (as well known to all) means
the dorm is still open. Without a watch,
and seeing that, that's ta half-hour plus
late, which means double minutes
(whatever that mean).
C. Free flick ON CAMPUS, starting
at 9 lets out at 11:58, therefore creating
instant late minutes for all who attended
this campus function. Attempted ex
planations of this fact met by . blank
stares on the part of the dorm officer
gleefully tolling off the minutes as the
little precious Carolina virgins troop in,
Joe Sanders
Larger Airport Needed
Pernicious government. Not only has
the Airport Authority inconvenienced the
public more every year, but now some
"board" is playing a kind of airport
Russian roulette with air travellers,
which includes most of UNC's out-of-state
students.
The Airport Authority is making ex-
from tne Durham Morning Herald
the discovery of a new one, will occur
in a year, or a decade, whenever the
educational community decides that it
needs a new system. Apparently most
schools, including Carolina, are willing
to let others lead the way, to let others
do the work, to settle for second best
nles, Sewer Ruling Stink
hustling to avoid losing more minutes.
How long, oh Lord, how long? Which
points us directlv at the crux of the
matter, which may be summarized in
three points.
1. To all. double-standard deans, ad
ministrators, hustling but roarrya-virgin
frat men, and scared virgins, young
and old, everywhere apprised of
a major fact of life: IT CAN BE DONE
IN THE AFTERNOON TOO! So much
for the rationale behind the hours
system. "
2. To all WOMEN on this campus:
this absurd situation will last only so
long as you let the pre-pubescents among
you and those above you make the
rule that govern your lives. At a college
age, which all of you are at by definition,
you have enough sense to come in out
. of the rain. By now, having matured
- physically, you know what it's all
about.
panion of Raleigh-Durham Airport dif
ficult by holding back on funds, according
to Henry Boyd, the airport's manager.
RaleighDurham, which can barely Ac
comodate jet traffic to begin with, it
i having trouble extending to a "Master
Plan" that will give it two runways
to accomodate its increasing air traffic.
The present runway is breaking up under
pressure from jet traffic.
Because Raieigh-Durham is a one
runway airport, all service must be
cut off sometime in June for runway
repairs. It will be cut off for about
two weeks, meaning that about 12,090
passengers wifl use another airport.
Eastern, which has expanded its jet
service into Raleigh-Durham recently,
doesn't know when the airport will be
closed down, so it is booking reservations
normally and will make adjustments
when the dates are announced.
For the 12,000 passengers who would
have used Raleigh-Durham, either
Greensboro's airport or one of Pied-,
mont's airports in the eastern part of
the state will have to do.
So during those two weeks,, air
travellers can either battle for reserva
tions in Greensboro or go to Geenville
and take She 21-6top cowpasture route
to Washington.
When the only major airport serving
Eastern North Carolina has to dose
down two weeks to repair a runway,
all the claims of North Carolina's at
tracting growth industries sounds silly.
Jet travel is the only way businessmen
can afford to get around, today, if they
want to run their business with any
kind of efficiency.
So when Raleigh-Durham closes down
sometime in June, 12,000 passengers will
have to battle it out somewhere else.
Unless, of course, it closes down during
fee first week of June: then departing
students from three large universities
will join the 12,000.
. until the true leaders of American educa
tion come up with an answer.
Defenders of the present methods of
student selection might feel that their
system is satisfactory, that skeptics of
the status quo are idealistic complainers
with no better method to offer, that
mane
-
Tor ourselves!
If you want to sleep with a boy,
go , ahead. If you don't want to sleep
with a particular boy, or with any, boys
at all, or even with girls, don't. The
choice is yours to make, and is only
yours. To abdicate it to anyone else
is degrading.
3. And to everybody: lay ..off the
double standard and join the Twentieth
Century. It's a better time to live in
than you think. .
Yours in peace and freedom,
James P. Kahan
Pollution Here?
To The Editor:
Yesterday, the Orange County com
missioners voted to allow the installation
of 0 septic tanks in an expanded trailer
park situated on a hill just above
University Lake, the water reservoir
of Chapel Hill and UNC. The com
missioners accepted the soothing evalua
tion of a local health official, who pro
fessed to see no dear danger and who,
coincidental also happens to own a
tract of developable land adjacent to
the land in question.
The commissioners chose to ignore
the warnings of Mr. Staton, a state
sanitary official, and of Profesor Daniel
Okun, of UNC's sanitary engineering
department. These warnings pointed out
the high incidence of septic tank failure
(which in this case will cause deposition
of sewage into the lake), the inefficiency
of water purification systems in remov
ing such parasites) as that reponsible
for hepatitis, and the possible danger
of long-term ingestion of the detergent
chemicals present even in treated and
"purified" effluent. The commissioners
also ignored a plea from Chancellor
Sitterson th&t the matter be given a
careful professional investigation before
reaching any decision.
i
i
The tie-breaking vote was cast by
Chapel Hill businessman Harvey Bennett.
Today's Durham Herald quotes him as
expressing concern; this concern ap
parently did not deter him from voting
in favor of the additional pollution.
Are local business interests so im
portant that our health must be put
in jeopardy? I certainly care what
put into my drinking water. Do you?
Lawrence Slifkin
313 Bnrlage Circle
Hie Daily Tar Heel accepts all
letters for publication provided
they are typed, double-paccd
and signed. Letters should te no
longer than 303 words in length.
We reserve the right to edit for
libelous statements.
criticism of existing tests are -43-documented
and are not authoritative
enough to suggest reform. The reader
may judge for himself from the foUo-srir.g
sources.
From College Board Review, Fa2
1957, no. 63, (later reprinted in the
Science Magazine), comes perhaps the
most exhaustive study of the problem
of educational as well as industrial aad
scientific testing. The article is wriUea
by David A. Goslin, staff sociologist
at the Russel Sage Foundation in
York.
Goslin reports that in the past decade
alone, criticisms of existing testirg
methods claim 47 books and articles.
His purpose is to summarize and analyze
the major existing criticisms. He cites
three types of individuals who might
be unfairly evaluated by existing testing
methods.
First in his examples are the deep
thinkers." The ambiguous wording of
many of the standardized questions leave
mere than one answer which may be
right. This type of question is purposely
used to differentiate between the vast
numbers of students who take the tests.
Deep or creative thinkers might pick
up an answer which is just as right
but4 less conventional that the correct
response.
Second on the list axe the culturally
disadvantaged and members of
distinctive cultural groups. Children from
homes where another language is spoken,
or where English is poorly used by
parents (slums), will naturally be defi
cient in the language.
Finally, a lack of experience in taking
tests such as the SAT or the GEE
may affect results. Special skills are
needed to know when and where not
to guess, when to answer only the easy
questions, etc.
The results of testing methods, now
used, Goslin points out, have left much
to be desired. . .test scores correlate
only moderately with long-range
academic performance and not at all
with postacademic performance, serious
questions are raised about the usefulness
of such scores and the amount of reliance
that ought to be placed on them."
Although he goes on to say that
this statement is a risky one to use
with so homogeneous a group as college
graduates, he sees the need for other
peronal characteristics to be tested
which are ". . .not measurable by in
telligence tests." This refers to such
qualities as motivation, creativity, social
skills and several other factors.
A variety of other complaints were
lodged but were still in die research
phase.
The Massachusetts Institute of
Technology Biographical Graduate
Admissions Study is being conducted by
MIT because it has completely dropped
the requirement of the GRE. Why? "Due
to the restriction in the range of talent
selected for graduate schools or for
other reasons, the Gaduate Record Ex
amination is of extremely limited
usefulness in prediction of academic suc
cess in Graduate school. In addition,
the Graduate Record Examination,
undergraduate grades and other selection
methods now being used have not
demonstrated any appreciable validity
in predicting the occupational success .
of the student after leaving graduate
school to enter a prefession."
Is MIT alone in its . dissatisfaction?
Not at all. Research is being carried
on in such universities as Harvard, Ohio
and Utah. In our own backyard, Duke
University is nearing tie completion of
as admissions study of its own. Ihe
story of its beginning was carried in
the News And Observer on Sunday,
November 27f 19C6, and The Greersboro
Daily News, of November 28, im The
paragraph reads: 'Two Duke University
psychologists have begun a study which
could have major impact on college
admissions procedures in the United
States."
It is "evident that there does exist
a problem in current testing techniques.
It is also evident that a small minority
of colleges and universities are out look
ing for a better way to choose their
undergraduate and graduate students.
Why so few? Cliff W. Wing, Jr. gives
the answer to this question and some
good advice in the October 26, 1965
College Bord article entitled "Student
Selection, Educational Treatment, and
the Training of Talent" He says: . .to
many people the thought of ex
perimenting with the education of our
youth is nothing short of horrifying.
It may shock such people to learn whrt
I believe to be the case: We have,
in a loose sense, been experimenting
for years with our children's duca
tion but badly. What we need now to
do is to perform experimental research
wisely and welL"
It is time for educators to stop ac
cepting what's being used as what's
best. There is a better method of student
selection but it may never be found
if the educational community doesn't
search for it. Some of the most in
stitutions have begun to look, but it
will take a concerted effort by all to
achieve success.