letters tothe editor comment yC 'Chairperson' violates parliamentary law? 1 Segregating the students Bill Bayliss, a member of the Chapel Hill Planning Board, has proposed that the town reword its zoning ordinance to define a family as "one person, two unrelated persons or two of more persons related by blood, marriage, legal adoption or guardianship and occupying a single family dwelling." Webster would undoubtedly quarrel with this definition. University students should quarrel with it as well. Itseffect is to keep groups of students from renting houses in areas zoned for "single family dwellings." Bayliss says that he is concerned that groups of students who can afford to divide rent among themselves will take over housing needed by low-income families. What he fails to recognize is that students are also frequently "low income," and are affected by the trend of higher rent just as other segments of the community. If Bayliss proposal is accepted, it might interfere not only with students, but also with families desiring to rent out rooms in their houses to unrelated persons. Bayliss suggests that a special provision could be put into the ordinance to allow such families to rent rooms. But in Bayliss proposal, a single student qualifies as a "family," and therefore could, under such a provision, rent a house and then sublet it to friends. Any such provision would probably be exceedingly difficult to enforce. Segregating the students from the rest of the town with exclusionary zoning law will not serve the interests of the town or the students. We certainly hope the town will decide against using its zoning ordinance to achieve this segregation. SI Alan Murray ' Editor Greg Porter Editor-Elect SatUt 84th Year of Editorial Freedom . Joni Peters Managing Editor Gregory Nye Associate Editor Dan Fesperman News Editor Merrill Rose Arts and Entertainment Thomas Ward Features and Freelance Grant Vosburgh Sports Editor Charles Hardy Photography Editor Rob Rosiello Wire Editor To the editor: 1 plead with my favorite campus newspaper to give up the usage "chairperson" and go back the the first principles so well stated by the National Association of Parliamentarians: "Whereas, Parliamentary Law has a language all it own; and "Whereas, In olden times the one presiding was the only person provided with a chair, while other sat on benches, hence he was called the Chairman: and "Whereas, No parliamentary law authority or dictionary recognizes the word "Chairperson": and "Whereas, Since time immemorial the term "Mister Chairman" or "Madam Chairman" has always been employed to differentiate between sexes; and " Whereas, Further effort toward sex differentiation is redundant and contrived; now therefore be it "Resolved: That organizations and parliamentarians of the National Association of Parliamentarians must use the term Chairman instead of "Chairperson" and be it Resolved: That all N.AP. members should habitually stress the principle that the work Chairman belongs to the title of the office the same as the title of President or Secretary." From The Trident (of Delta, Delta, Delta sorority, Winter, 1977) Roy R. Kuebler, Jr. Professor Emeritus Tar Heel fans praised To the editor: As an alumnus of UNC, 1 was interested in a memeographed memo that was distributed to the Wake Forest crowd at the Wake Forest-N.C. State basketball game in Winston-Salem Saturday night. The letter read as follows: - "What is the difference between an ACC basketball game in Winston Salem as opposed to one in Chapel H ill? This question can be answered in two words: 'The Fans. Granted, Carmichael holds more than the Winston-Salem Coliseum. Why though is the average Carolina fan more vocal than the average. WFU student? Could this be due to the success of the team? In past, years you could have used this as an . v-t j.jt rv ju-zfe fiivL ifTixf n tF cm TRWNIM& AR$KN fAE, IS THIS THE OFFICE OFTHH ...NICE SHCT...HXSASINATl0NS GWAITTEE?' excuse, but this year you cannot! The fans in Chapel Hill are true blue, but fans at Wake Forest cannot truthfully claim such loyalty. The vocal support of the fans can be both an offensive and defensive weapon, but during the games this year in Winston-Salem, this has not been the case. The past Clemson gajne was a perfect example. If Carolina was down by three at the half, their fans would make it a point to get their team fired up. The Deacon fans didn't attempt to show any emotion until their team finally tied the score. Simple clapping of the hands and the chanting of 'defense' motivates a team. These have been nonexistent at Wake games w hether the fans realize it or not. Also, if Carolina had lost such a game, it would have been 'We lost' instead of 'They lost" (the attitude that most Wake fans take after such a loss.) The Deacs are No. 1 in the ACC, but their fans are No. 7. Let's face it, you aren't deserving of a team of such quality! You may think we are too harsh comparing you to Carolina tans. We don't think so. If we can beat Carolina in basketball, surelv we can beat them in support! Deacon Fans, you have three more chances to prove us wrong. Do it!" The letter was signed. by "a group of concerned Deacon fans." Looks like word gets around about Tar Heel fans. Congratulations. George Howard 382 1 Country Club Rd. Winston-Salem it's good to give it away To the edijtor: To the 'three mimes in the Pit on Tuesday: thanks once again for bringing some wonder into my day. We are each a wonder, and it is good to give it away, a gift to whomever will accept it. Mike Newton 210 Weaver Rd., Apt. 3 Give us a replay To the editor: A petty beef there are no replays given on pinball machines in Chapel Hill, only extra balls. Some bars say it's because of a local ordinance against activities akin to gambling. City Hall says they know of none. Others say it's a state law, but replays are given in other parts of the state. Does the distributor set the machines? He never answered. The poor variety of machines in this town is one thing to contend with. But replays? Is it too much to ask to have that smallj sporadic thrill of accomplishment with a glass of beer? P. R. Raiford 325 Barclay Rd. The Daily Tar Heel welcomes letters to the editor. Letters must be typed, double spaced, on a 60-space line and are subject to editing for libelous content or bad taste. Letters that run over 25 lines (150 words) are subject to condensation. Letters should be mailed to the editor. Daily Tar Heel, Carolina Union. Unsigned or. initialed columns on this page represent the opinion of the Daily Tar Heel. Signed columns or cartoons represent the opinion of the individual contributor only. eg r if "o)firo) TP P-H mm U LnJ fo)n nriro)n mmm uJj mM --- -! HHi NEW HOURS Sun., Mon. - 1 1 :00 a.m.-9:30 p.m. Tues.-Thurs. 1 1 a.m. to Midnight Fri. and Sat. 1 1 :00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sun., Mon. 1 1 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. Four years old today To celebrate, we offer today's special coupon. To celebrate further look for weekly coupons in the TAR HEEL every Monday. r I l i e i i i i Good through Sun., Feb. 20 mf off any purchase of a sandwichbeverage combination I I I I I I I I I i I i I I 1 I i3 Good only in Chapel Hill dth 217

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view