6fTh8 Oaily Tar HeelTuesday;, September 22, 1981
FalweM
Jim Hummel. vJim
Susan Mauney. Editor
Mark Murrell. Associate Edit
JONATHAN RICH. Associate Editor
Was
EDWINA RALSTON. University Editor
JOHN ROYSTER. City Editor
CHARLES HERNDON. State and National Editor
BETH BURRELL. Nan Editor
Clifton Barnes. Spom Editor '
Tom Moore. Arts Editor
Keith King. Features Editor
SCOTT SHARPE, Photography Editor
Ann Peters, sought Editor
Chuck James, Ombudsman
Stop and go
Newcomers to Chapel Hill often are amazed at how pedestrians take
control of many busy roads in town, using their right-of-way advantage
to brave traffic during rush-hour periods. .
At UNC, so the legend goes, a freshman is easily recognized because he
is the one who stops and looks before crossing the street.
This attitude, though, has led to some accidents, several of which gained
publicity last spring when pedestrians were hit by automobiles on Franklin
Street.
As a result, the N.C. Department of Transportation, on the request of
the Chapel Hill Town Council, is in the process of installing a crosswalk
signal in front of the NCNB Plaza on Franklin Street, one of the more
heavily used paths in town. While expressing its concern for the safety of
pedestrians at the crosswalk, the council failed to recognize that installing
a light might not be as effective as planners predicted and could hurt the
village atmosphere that makes Franklin Street unique.
Perhaps the most disturbing fact, however, is that few students knew
of the council's intentions and had little say in the proposal, which was
originally rejected two years ago and then narrowly passed by a 5-4 vote
last spring.
The light, which cost the state $6,000, effectively elirninates the last
place handicapped and blind students can cross without having to worry
about a changing light signal.
The Student Government Transportation Committee opposes the light
and has requested that students let the committee know whether they sup
port the installation of the signal.
A Department of Transportation spokesman said Monday his men
were working on connecting the signal, but that it was not too late to take
the light down. If students do not favor the crosswalk signal they should
speak out. A concerted opposition might delay installation or at least
make the Town Council reconsider its action.
Speech impediment
For years television and radio stations have been regulated by laws re
stricting their coverage of political events and controversial issues. The
Federal Communications Commission's recent declaration against these
laws has initiated debate over a sensitive and potentially explosive issue.
The laws in question are the equal time and the fairness doctrine. Al
though both restrict media coverage, they have different histories and
status, and should be treated as such. - -
The fairness doctrine, adopted in 1949, states that broadcasters must
provide time for contrasting views after airing programs on controversial
issues. Created by the FCC to ensure that a then-limited number of radio
and TV stations provided balanced coverage of controversial issues, the
fairness doctrine is not an established law and could be abolished by the
FCC.
The fairness doctrine provides the philosophical basis for several regula
tions, such as the personal attack and political editorial rules, which
stipulate that after any personal attack or political endorsement, a broad
caster must provide equal time for rebuttal. Although the fairness doctrine
and accompanying rules are well-intentioned, they are now restrictive and
outdated.
At issue it the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech.
Unlike newspapers and magazines, who have complete editorial freedom,
TV and radio stations are often hesitant to tackle controversial social or
political issues. Despite the legitimate concern of church and labor groups
that TV networks will use their power to limit diverse opinions, there now
exists a wide-ranging spectrum of TV and radio networks so as to ensure
several interpretations of any issue. If anything, repeal of the fairness doc
trine should encourage increased editorial comment. ,
Adopted in 1927, the equal time law states that if a broadcaster airs a
message by a political candidate, he must offer an equal opportunity to
any opponent. As with the fairness doctrine, much of the controversy
hinges on First Amendment rights.
Opponents have argued that the Constitution guarantees any individual
or organization to express its own views either verbally or through the
media. The logical and legal extension of the First Amendment would
prohibit any regulation of political coverage or advertisements in the media.
The equal time law, however, only ensures that various political candi
dates have an equal opportunity to use their freedom of speech. As recent
elections have demonstrated, political advertisement can exert tremen
dous influence over election results. It is therefore vital that no single can
didate be allowed disproportionate advertising time by a sympathetic net
work. While the FCC is justified in opposing the fairness doctrine, the
equal time law must stand as separate and necessary legislation.
The Bottom Line
Roving reporter
As faithfal reporters of the news, we
know that people frequently keep their
eyes more on us than on the event we're
covering. What else explains why one of
the most watched women at the Miss
America Pageant in Atlantic City was
not a contestant but a reporter?
Obviously impressed with her re
porting skills, many spectators kept a
close eye on Rita Jenrette, a mild
mannered reporter who wrote five
columns about the pageant for a Phila
delphia newspaper.
Jenrette, probably the only reporter
ever to be featured topless in Playboy,
said she tried to keep a low profile
during the pageant.
"You won't see too much of me,"
she said before the pageant. Of course,
she said that before she posed for
Playboy too.
"Journalists always think, that good
journalism is go-get-em Mike Wallace-
(War mm
A year of editorial freedom
type journalism. But is it journalism
or is it sensationalism?" asked
Jenrette, who has been accused of be
ing pretty sensational herself.
Jenrette was specifically following
Miss Texas, Sheri Ryman of Texas
City. Speaking on Ryman, Jenrette
said, "She is warm and congenial,
and, above all, she's no dumb blonde."
Neither is Rita Jenrette, of course.
All reporters are warm, congenial, and
above all, intelligent, perceptive,
thoughtful, witty, insightful, etc. The
pageant chairman, Albert Marks, said
before the pageant that there would
be no favoritism for Jenrette.
"She'll be treated like any other
reporter," he said, because, of
course, she is just like any other
reporter. People always stare at us,
ask us to appear on talk shows and beg
for us to do another photo essay in
Playboy.
And that's the bottom line.
By KERRY DeROCHI
One day a week, the Rev. Jerry Falwell
is seen worldwide leading congregations
on the "Old Time Gospel Hour.' As
head of the Thomas Road Baptist Church
in Lynchburg, Va., his voice is heard
thundering from the pulpit, preaching the
gospels of fundamentalist Christians.
The six other days, as head of the
Moral Majority, Falwell is spokesman for
one of the fastest growing political move
ments the New Right. He has said re
peatedly he does not challenge the tradi
tional American separation of politics and
religion." But from the rigid stands on
abortion, capital punishment and women
in combat, the group has been forcing
moral issues into the political arena.
In Quotes1
"We believe in decency, morality and
the family," Falwell said Friday in a press
conference in Raleigh. "But nowhere do
we believe that we can impose our philo
sophy on someone else's lifestyle.... The
fundamental meaning of the first amend
ment is that every person has the right to
speak what he believes as long as it isn't
to the hurt of somebody else.
'Abortion today is the issue the civil
rights issue of the 1980s and it is not
going to go away. There was never a time
in the history of a Supreme Court justice
hearing when that (abortion) was put to
the justice as many times as this time.
President Ronald Reagan will tell you
that this was the case last year. From here
on out if you are going to run for dog cat
cher you had better do right on that
issue."
Not everyone has endorsed the views of
the Moral Majority. Falwell said old con
servative leaders, including Sen. Barry
Goldwater, R-Ariz., had not joined the
movement because they did not want to
relinquish their positions at the forefront
of the old conservative movement. In
stead they idly watch as Sens. Jesse .
Helms and John East of North Carolina
emerge as the new political leaders, he
said.
"Sen. Goldwater has every right to say
what he says," Falwell said. "One friend
on Capitol Hill said, 'Jerry, ignore him,
he's senile.' I don't believe that. I really
don't believe that. I think the senator is a
human being and like the rest of us is re
sponding negatively to the fact that the
conservative movement, old and new, is
now merged. It has passed him. I think
when he settles down (he'll) realize he is
still a man we all look up to and respect,
but that we can't let the movement stop
because he refuses to accept new issues
that have come onto the scene.
"The fact that Goldwater said abortion
is not a conservative issue and is secondary
to the economy said a lot to conservative
people who say, 'Hey, you are missing
the mark.' If you would ask him how
much mail he's gotten lately and how it
runs, we know. He will tell you that the
mail has been like 10 to 1 hurtful, and
saying 'Hey we love you, we wish you
would straighten up on this. We get
copies of the letters."
Goldwater's criticisms of the New
Right, Falwell said, are not indicative of
the administration's attitude. As a cham
pion of moral issues, Reagan has asked
leaders of the New Right to have patience
while he concentrates on the economy,
Falwell said. Once Congress approves his
budget programs, Reagan will turn his at
tention again to the social issues, Falwell
said.
Letters to the editor
SU1W9 amazes reader
To the editor:
The DTH continues to amaze me with
its one-sided approach to the problems of
the Middle East. While the Begin govern
ment definitely warrants criticism, it is er
roneous to place criticism solely on it. As
the DTH would leave you to believe, there
are no other players in the game of Middle
Eastern politics.
In the editorial, "Clouded issues" (DTH,
Sept. 17), the DTH has failed to either
recognize or get through all the clouds.
While it acknowledges the reality of the
Soviet threat in the Middle East, it ques
tions the anti-Soviet strategy that the
United States is now pursuing with Israel.
Stockpiling medical supplies in Israel as
well as entering into joint naval manuevers
represents nothing when one considers the
hundreds of military personnel already in
Saudi Arabia and the joint military ma
nuevers in Egypt last year.
Does the DTH question these events,
or even the proposed sale of AWACS radar
planes to Saudi Arabia, which would fur
ther commit U.S. personnel? The answer
is simple it does not. The DTH docs not
even entertain the "arms for oil" issue.
Neither does it dare to write of Egyptian
'. President Anwar Sadat's recent crackdown
of religious and political opposition in
Egypt.
There are still more clouds not men
tioned. The editorial points to the solving
of political conflicts as a key to "an over
all strategy to secure peace in the Middle
East." While absolutely correct, the DTH
only mentions Begin "Reagan must let
Begin know soon...." Why cannot Reagan"
also let the so-called moderate monarchs
of Jordan and Saudi Arabia know that they
play an equally important role in the pro
cess toward peace? These countries are also
a part of the political obstacles and hopes
for an overall solution.
It is unfair for the DTH to cloud further
the already complicated issues by blinding
(
' V i :
S;S;:::fc::;
:
J
Jerry Falwell
. "
Moral Majority leader Jerry Falwell spoke
recently in Raleigh. The Baptist minister
concentrated on the unity of the conser
vative movement. (Staff photos by Scott
Sharpe)
'We do believe the president's commit
ment is real," Falwell said. "We believe
the majority of the Senate and perhaps a
majority in the House is there to work
with us. By the end of next year, 1982, the
majority will be much larger in the House
and Senate, in my opinion.
"I think Americans can join hands to
gether on shared moral issues," Falwell
said. "The problems we have had is that
liberals have always been able to do that.
They may be fighting each other all year
long, but when it comes time to elect a
candidate or support a program, they will
lay down their arms, join hands and win.
Conservatives have always had the ten
dency of shooting their own wounded.
We can't agree on everything, so we
won't do anything together.
"That's changed. As a matter of fact,
it has changed so rapidly in the last five
years especially the last two years
that it has frightened everybody. The rea
son why we have so many people scream
ing bloody murder is that we've put to
gether a coalition the largest such co
alition numerically ever put together."
The opposition to the New Right, Fal
well said, has played into the hands of the
Moral Majority leaders. Leading liberals
in and out of government have attacked
the group, but their sharp criticism has
only fostered steady growth in the organi
zation, he said.
our chance to attain a total perspective;
furthermore, it is poor quality, yet typical
journalism. Let's give the conflicts involved
their proper due. Cutting off one side from
the discussion will only force the other to
react negatively, and what hope for a solu
tion lies in that approach? If the DTH is to
try to see through the clouds, it should not
turn back when it sees a black one.
Moreover, it has a moral obligation to its
readers to stay informed and to present the
issues in their entirety.
Michael Kimerling
. Chapel Hill
Card clarification
To the editor:
In regard to Joey Roberson's comments
on the University of California at Los
Angeles card section in "Frat brothers
use computer for card tricks" (DTH,
Sept. 17), we would like to clarify the
situation.
There are no reserved student seats for
UCLA football games. Hence, students
must wait up to four hours before the
start of football games to get good seats.
The most cherished seats are those located
in the famed UCLA card section.
Students in this section are the first to
arrive and not just freshmen, as was er
roneously stated. As veterans of many
card stunts we can say that they were co
cordinated very well because of the efforts
of the Rally Committee.
We saw what it was we were spelling or
drawing out because each stunt was pic
tured in miniature on the field. Each stunt
was numbered and students were given in
structions at halftime as to what colors to
hold up as the numbers were called out.
Intricate stunts, such as the blue-and-gold
spell-out of UCLA, were accomplish
ed by counting off written numbers by a
i
V
f
.. -:
"I told Time magazine this the other
day," Falwell said. "If we wrote the script
for the enemy if we had written the
script, they couldn't have been playing
it any better. Because they are vicious,
unfounded, distorted attacks upon the
Moral Majority. And they are the
number one catalyst for our growth.
"Norman Lear and George McGovern,
more than any other two persons, have
helped the Moral Majority become the
force it is. Norman Lear, he's such a
hypocrite. You know, he is the Hugh
Hefner of television. He had planned to
do for television what Hugh Hefner had
done'for the publishing industry any
thing goes. He pretty well came close to
doing that Maude, Mary Hartman,
Mary Hartman. I mean the scenarios were
getting more vulgar all the time.
"Suddenly here comes a coalition for
better television. And here is America
standing up, saying 'Hey, we don't want
a cesspool in our living rooms. We're not
talking about Ozzie and Harriet. We're
talking about decency, four-letter words
and bedroom scenes.
"Boom. 110 industries agree with us
and Norman Lear is out of business. His
problem is an economic one. If he would
just be honest and admit that. His pro
blem is that we've cut him off at the pass.
He's going to have to create some decent
programs and that bothers him.
"George McGovern is unemployed. So
he makes a nice $5,000 speech to attack
with slanted
member of the Rally Committee. Hence,
we achieved a flowing effect, one that we
are quite famous for and very proud of.
Thank you for the opportunity to set
the record straight.
Vic Sison
Larry Berman
UCLA Class of 1981
Tar Heel Manor P-6
Poor drinkers
To the editor:
You publish a letter from the Student
Legal Services warning us not to drink in
public, "Public consumption of alcohol
is not legal" (DTH, Sept. 17). Well and
good. But you also publish an article tell
ing us that tailgate parties are fun. They
sure are. But suppose that I am offered a
drink at a tailgate party. Am I breaking
the law? And if so, are the police letting
me off because I'm drinking with rich
alumni, who love the Carolina cult, and
not with poor students who come here to
study?
T.H.Shand
666 Craige
Thoughtful questions
To the editor:
I am 89 years old and have had great
consolation and benefit from the follow
ing list of thought questions. I graduated
from UNC in 1917. When we were assem
bled in Memorial Hall for the graduation
exercises, each member of the class got his
diploma and also received the list of ques
tions typed on a separate sheet of paper.
It was simply specified as a gift from
Dr. M.H. Stacy who was dean at that time.
There were no quotation marks and I
would guess it was the personal work of
Dr. Stacy.
v
0 y
V y
H
H ..,111 II
mimixm''- -v,;v,r:Y:. ;:-X;:X ' : ft? ,: :? :i l-iiS K
y-::--.;;ii:::-&-:: :;&;:: ':' : v . .';..: . :: ':::'.': . .:'" ' :-. .: :.:'.:::
If V ) i .
the Moral Majority. If we can help it he
will remain unemployed for a while."
Falwell has said that his organization
believes in the separation of church and
state. His message is directed toward
spurring people of different religious
backgrounds to actively participate in
moral issues. His organization, he said, is
open to all persons concerned with the
effects of liberalism which has lead to
forced busing, federally-funded abortions
and the destruction of the traditional
family.
"Whether you like it or not, every
American all 226 million of us is a
member of a fraternity called citizenship
in the United States of America," Falwell
said. "We're not there on theological
agreements; we are there on political
agreements. We agree this is the country
in which we want to hold our citizenship.
"Why can we not as citizens, not on
any theological premise, but purely on
our commitment to the United States of
America to the cause of freedom and
shared moral values come together as
citizens? Not as Christians, not as Jews,
not as Mormons. As citizens. And fight
the battle together while still retaining our
integrity and distinctiveness religiously.
"That's exactly what we're doing."
Kerry DeRochi, a junior journalism and
English major from Greensboro, is a staff
writer for The Daily Tar Heel.
approach
The thought came to me that it would
be a fitting memorial to Dr. Stacy to let it
be included in some of yoiir material for
publication. I also thought it might bene
fit others.
,. Has education given you sympathy
with all good causes and made you eager
to espouse them?
2. Has it made you public-spirited?
3. Has it made you a brother to the
weak?
4. Have you learned to make friends
and keep them? Do you know what it is
to be a friend yourself?
5. Can you look an honest man or a
pure woman straight in the eye?
6. Do you see anything to love in a
little child?
7. Will a lonely dog follow you in the
street?
8. Can you be high-minded and happy
in the meaner drudgeries of life?
9. Do you think washing dishes or
hoeing corn just as compatible with high
thinking as piano playing or golf?
10. Are you good for anything to your
self? Can you be happy alone?
11. Can you look out on the world and
see anything except dollars and cents?
12. Can you look into a mud puddle
by the wayside and see the clear sky?
13. Can you see anything in the puddle
but mud?
14. Can you look into the sky at night
and see beyond the stars?
15. Can your soul claim relationship
with the Creator?
M. Herbert Randolph
Lexington