10The Daily Tar HeelThursday, December 3, 1992
0
y;!Vo you
Know ne? Probity
n. I'm -Ihe
Stub Body
President, John
XVc propose
noting, eJ
no role ' -Me
issues 4hf- cestctrsi
suJeos. XiS
M yvho
Knts!
Established in 1893
100th year of editorial freedom
nof even here
Existence mens
PETER WAHSTEN, Editor Office horns: Fridays 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Anna GRIFFIN, University Editor ASHLEY FOGLE, Editorial Page Editor
Dana Pope, City Editor REBECAH MOORE, State and National Editor
Yl-HsiN CHANG, Features Editor WARREN HYNES, Sports Editor
Erin RANDALL, Photography Editor DAVID J. KUPSTAS, SportSaturday Editor
Amy SEELEY, Copy Desk Editor DAVID COUNTS, Layout Editor
ALEX De GRAND, Cartoon Editor AMBER NimOCKS, Omnibus Editor
JOHN CASERTA, Graphics Editor
if
litre iv ncr
even here.
r i t
I ei I In1 m II I
The (Native) American way
The call for recruiting Native-American faculty
members has been heard, and it appears that some
thing finally is being done.
Tuesday's meeting between members of the Caro
lina Indian Circle and Provost Richard McCormick
was the first in a series of steps that should be taken
to deal with issues of Native-American faculty.
While McCormick and the University are to be
commended for taking some initiative in trying to
recruit a Native-American faculty member, efforts
must not stop there. UNC cannot afford to exercise
the same carelessness that led to the mysterious
disappearance of a list of 250 Native Americans with
Ph.D.s. Instead, it must stay committed to recogniz
ing the need and striving to meet it.
And while some may argue that Native Americans
only make up a small portion of the University
community, they must realize that numbers do not
make this portion any less significant. Like all stu
dents, who often feel the need to have someone with
whom they can identify, UNC's Native-American
students have that same need.
In addition, Native Americans are a sizable minor
ity across North Carolina and a segment of the
population that should not be overlooked so com
pletely at the state's flagship institution. Thus, it is
the responsibility of the University to pursue the
Carolina Indian Circle's goals and take their con
cerns seriously.
Eventually, Native-American instructors should
be permanent members of the University commu
nity, and Native-American courses should be part of
the curriculum.
Although McCormick has said there won't be any
immediate decisions made about hiring a Native
American woman who currently is being interviewed,
University officials must remember that students
should not be expected to wait forever. The Univer
sity must remain committed to its plan of raising the
consciousness of deans and department chairmen
about the need for faculty diversity.
Perhaps with the help of these department chair
men, deans and other University officials, students
and others in the community can begin to experience
the culture from not just one, but several degree
holding Native-American faculty members.
A sigh of relief
On behalf of women around the nation, may we
just say, "Whew."
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to
hear an appeal from a lower court ruling that declared
Guam's broad prohibition on abortion unconstitu
tional. Consistent with the ReaganBush agenda, the Su
preme Court gradually has been eroding the scope
and authority of the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision.
There has been speculation that the Court was pre
paring to overturn outright that decision, which pre
vents states from outlawing abortion.
Recent court decisions have allowed states to
place restrictions, some of them severe, on the avail
ability of abortion. But the Court's refusal to hear
Guam's appeal clearly announces that the attack on
Roe vs. Wade will only be allowed to go so far.
If the Court were of a mind to overturn Roe, this
case would have been a golden opportunity.
Guam's law allowed for an abortion only when
two doctors agreed that the procedure was necessary
to save the mother's life or prevent a "grave" threat
to her health. This law stopped just short of com
pletely prohibiting abortion, and an affirmation of
the law would have delivered a grievous blow to
women's rights.
The Court's refusal to hear the case is not necessar
ily a resounding affirmation of Roe, since the five
justices voting not to grant the appeal did not write an
opinion explaining their action. But beggars can't be
choosers, and these days abortion rights advocates
will take what they can get and be happy about it.
The fact that the Court skipped an excellent opportu
nity to overturn Roe is cause enough for celebration.
The future is looking bright, as well.
While Supreme Court justices should not be nomi
nated and affirmed for their political leanings or
opinions of the law on particular issues, it is highly
probable that any Clinton nominees to the Court will
tend to protect rather than denigrate the authority of
the Roe decision.
As a matter of principle, ends should never be
allowed to justify the means. Hence, activists on both
sides of the abortion debate are wrong when they
consistently promote and encourage litmus tests for
nominees to the Supreme Court.
But the women in Amtrica, whose interests re
quire that coathangers continue to be used for clothes
and not surgery, are fortunate that the current admin
istration is, at least, on the right side of the debate.
IKS
S!KSSTOMi'i, "tW.K f1
Editorial Policy
The Daily Tar Heel's editorials are approved by the majority of the editorial board which is composed of the editor,
editorial page editor and five editorial writers.
iiPMPiriiMr
Business tnd advertising: Kevin Schwartz, oVatfo
manager.
Business stall: Gina Berardlno, assistant manager Holly Aldrfdge, Steve Politl and Rhonda Walker, receptionists.
Classllled advertising: Kristen Costello, Tina Habash, Leah Richards, Christ! Thomas and Steve Verier, representatives; Chad Campbell, production assistant
Display advertising: Ashleigh Heath, advertising manaoer; Milton Artls, marketing oVracforMarcle Bailey, Laurie Baron, Michelle Buckner, Jennifer Danich, Will Davis,
Shannon Edge, Pam Horkan, Jed Kilman and Maria Miller, account executives; Sherrl Cockrum, creative director.
Advertising production: Bill Leslie, managersystem administrator; Stephanie Brodsky and Aimee Hobbs, assistants.
Assistant editors: Jackie Hershkowitz and Kelly Ryan, city; Samantha Falke, copy; Renee Gentry, layout; Jayson Singe, photo; John C. Manuel, Amy McCaffrey, Steve
Politl and Bryan Strickland, sports; Jason Richardson, state and national; Marly Mlnchin and Jennifer Talhelm, university.
Newsclerfc Kevin Brennan.
Editorial writers: Gerri Baer, Jacqueline Charles, Alan Martin, Charles Overbeck and Dacla Toll.
University: Daniel Aldrlch, Ivan Arrington, Thanassis Cambanis, Sheri Chen, Joyce Clark, Tiffany Derby, Melissa Dewey, Casella Foster, Kathleen Keener, Gautam
Khandelwal, James Lewis, Bill Llckert, Chris Lindsay, Steve Robbies, Chris Robertson, Gary Rosenzweig, Justin Scheet, Brad Short, Peter Sigal and Holly Stepp.
City: Tiffany Ashhurst, John Ashley, Nathan Bishop, Leah Campbell, Maile Carpenter, Dale Castle, Karen Clark, Debi Cynn, Richard Dalton, Matthew Henry, William
Huffman, Rama Kayyali, Chad Merritt, Shakti Routray, Robert Strader, Suzanne Wuelfing and Kathleen Wurth.
State and National: Eric Lusk, senior writer, Anna Burdeshaw, Tim Burrows, Tara Duncan, Paul Garber, Stephanie Greer, Steven Harris, Scott Holt, Rahsaan Johnson,
Andrea Jones, Leila Maybodi, Jerry McElreath, Beth McNichol, Julie Nations, Adrienne Parker, Kurt Raatzs, Bruce Robinson, Alia Smith and Allison Taylor.
Arts: Rahul Mehta, coordinator; Kathleen Rynn, Waynette Gladden, Mondy Lamb, Alex McMillan, Elizabeth Oliver, Jonathan Rich, Martin Scott, Jennl Spitz, Sally Stryker,
Cara Thomisser, Mark Watson, Emma Williams and Duncan Young.
Features: Stephanie Beck, Elena Bourgoin, Monica Brown, John Davies, Maria DiGlano, Erika Helm, Ted Lotchln, Phuong Ly, Deepa Perumallu, Aullca Rutland, LeAnn
Spradling, Scott Tillett, Lloyd Whittington and Andrea Young.
Sports: Eric David and David J. Kupstas, senior writers; Zachary Albert, Rodney Cline, Adam Davis, Marc Franklin, Brian Gould, Stephen Higdon, Diana Koval, Mary
Laff erty, Alison Lawrence, Jacson Lowe, Brian McJunkin, Jeff Mckinley, Pete Simpkinson, Carter Toole, Philip Weickert, James Whitfield and Pete Zifchak.
Photography: Missy Etelto, Dale Castle, Jim Fugia, Jill Kaufman, Chns Kirkman, Ellen Ozier. Evie Sandlln, Jennie Shipen and Debbie Stengel.
Copy Editors: Angeligue Bartlett, Stephanie Beck, Robin Caole, Eliot Cannon. Caroline Chambre. Laura Chappell. Monica Clearv. Kim Costello. Jav Davis. Debbie Eldson.
Jennifer Heinzen, Kelly Johnston, Amy Kincaid, David Lindsay, Nimesh Shah, Cassaundra Sledge, Jenifer Stinehetler, Leslie Ann Teseniar, Jackie Torok and Kenyatta
upcnurcn.
Graphics: Jin Angel, Kim Horstmann, jay Koseoorougn and Justin scneet.
Cartoonists: Mandy Brame, Mary Brutzman, Sterling Chen, Kasumba Rayne De Carvalho, Katie Kasben, Michelle Kelley. Tanya Kennedy. Sergio Rustia Miranda and Jason
Smith.
Editorial Prediction: Stacy Wynn, manager Lisa Reichle, assistant
DistrltitiM tat Printing: village Printing Company
The DaRy Tar Nttl h puMMwd by Hit DTH Publishing Corp., a non-profit North Carolina corporation, Monday-Friday, according to the University calendar.
Callers with ouestiom about billing or display advertising should dial 962-1 163 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 o.m. Classified ads can be reached at 962-0252. Editorial
questions should be directed to 962-02450246.
Campn mail address: CM 5210 tu 4s, Carolina Unita
Office: Salt 104 Carolina Unit
U.I. Mali address: P.O. la 1237. Chapel Mil, NC 2751S-J257
At last: Medical community recognizes women
The medical profession suddenly is
realizing that women exist
For the past 20 years or so,
women have been making strides in
health and medical careers, establish
ing themselves in the upper echelons as
doctors and researchers. Unfortunately,
women on the other end of the stetho
scope have remained second-class citi
zens. The medical profession doesn't have
a particularly good history of listening
to women's concerns or focusing on
women's problems. For centuries, the
healthy, normal specimen of mankind
has been just that mankind. Doctors
and researchers have wielded a double
edged sword against women's bodies.
On the one hand, women have been
seen as fatally flawed merely because
we are women. We are the second sex,
the weaker sex. Something about hav
ing a uterus and ovaries damages you as
a human being, makes you more sus
ceptible to mood swings, less intelli
gent, less rational. Because we diverge
from the male norm, we are deviant. We
are other.
On the other hand, we never thought
we'd achieve too much equality.
By ignoring or discounting the medi
cal experiences of women, researchers
and doctors have become too egalitar
ian, too willing to overlook the differ
ences between the sexes. Not only are
healthy white men the standard for
health, unhealthy white men are the
standard for disease.
The medical profession, stuck in its
male-focused mentality, has overlooked
the fact that health problems might af
fect woman and men differently. It has
long ignored disease symptoms pecu
liar to women. Studies and research
often have focused exclusively on male
Alisa
DeMao
Life Under
Siege
fiiihiprs As a i g a
result, scores of
women have
suffered or died
of common
health problems
unrecognized
by their doctors.
But things
are looking up.
For instance:
Physicians are
finding that re
search on heart
disease in women is a full generation
behind that of heart disease in men.
Scientists have been doing experiments
and research on this particular medical
problem for about 50 years. Unfortu
nately, the overwhelming majority of
their subjects have been you guessed
it men.
Heart disease generally doesn't af
fect women in the same ways it affects
men. It doesn't strike them at the same
point in life. The symptoms often are
not the same.
Doctors and researchers have been
charting the course of heart disease in
men for the last half-century. This pro
cess has just begun for women.
But at least the medical profession is
beginning to realize the problems
women face. Some agencies like the
Center for Disease Control in Atlanta
are even doing something about it.
In January, the CDC will add three
new diseases pulmonary tuberculo
sis, recurrent pneumonia and invasive
cervical cancer to the list of diseases
that indicate fully developed AIDS in
people infected with HTV, the virus that
causes AIDS. The decision follows re
peated demands by activists who ac
cused the government of ignoring symp
toms suffered primarily or particularly
by women.
Currently, the center lists 23 indica
tor diseases that lead to an AIDS diag
nosis in HIV-infected people. One of
them, Kaposi'ssarcoma,isacancer that
occurs primarily in men.
The CDC originally opposed adding
the three new diseases, because they
occur fairly frequently in people who
are not infected by AIDS. But activists
presented studies that showed these dis
eases are more common and worse in
HIV-infected people because of the
virus' s destruction of their immune sys
tems. The revised list has the potential to
affect government disability benefits
for thousands of people currently in
fected with HTV but not diagnosed with
AIDS. An AIDS diagnosis also would
allow these people to participate in drug
trials and qualify for low-cost AIDS
drugs.
Just as important, the revised list
arms women with powerful, federally
backed ammunition in their battle with
physicians particularly gynecologists
who have refused to take their wor
ries and concerns seriously: Tricia
Grindel, an activist with AID Atlanta,
told one reporter, "I've heard horror
stories of women with persistent gyne
cological problems who request an HIV
test and are refused."
By accepting cervical cancer as an
AIDS indicator in HIV-positive women,
the CDC has taken an important step in
helping female patients achieve equal
status in the doctor's office.
A small step, but significant.
Alisa DeMao is a senior journalism
and political science major from Garner.
Educational Foundation
benefits entire University
To the editor:
It was disappointing to read the lead
editorial in your Nov. 1 2 edition regard
ing the Educational Foundation. I was
quite puzzled by what would have mo
tivated the editorial board to author
such a piece.
The Educational Foundation's effort
to reach out to current students so that
those who are interested might become
a part of sup xuting the Carolina ath
letic program and the student-athletes
who constitute it seems to be a very
appropriate . endeavor on the
foundation's part.
The Educational Foundation has sup
ported athletics at this University since
1938, and it has done so in a manner of
full compliance with NCAA rules and
regulations.
It is an outstanding organization made
up of quality people more than 90
percent of whom are graduates of this
University.
Besides having provided the means
to fund a college education for more
than 6,000 UNC students during the
past 54 years, the Educational Founda
tion is responsible for many other good
works on this campus.
The foundation recently committed
$3.65 million to the Uni versity ' s Bicen
tennial Campaign and in recent years
gave $50,000 to the University's librar
ies to assist in keeping those facilities
open for longer hours to benefit the
student body as a whole.
It is not my inclination to question
your editorial stances, but I do feel that
this one was unjust.
I appreciate the opportunity to share
some of the positive aspects of a first
class organization that exists to benefit
this university, its athletic program and
its students past, present and future.
JOHND.SWOFFORD
Director of Athletics
Pelvic exam article gave
important information
To the editor:
I was offended and disgusted that
Ruth Dobson and J J. Warlick could not
see past the frank and informative dis
cussion of a terror-shrouded medical
procedure to appreciate the worth of the
article "Dreaded pelvic exam key to
women's fight against cervical cancer."
The deterrorizing of a still somewhat
dehumanizing experience for women is
needed to convince women to go to talk
to the Student Health counselors in the
first place. Women hesitant about the
procedure might be just as hesitant about
talking about the procedure with a coun
selor. If more people had an idea of
what went on in the exam before they
even went to the clinic or doctor's of
fice, more women might be inclined to
make the appointment that could save
their, lives.
When I read Dobson and Warlick's
letter, I was confused as to their reason
ing to keep the goings-on of a pelvic
exam from the public. They questioned,
"since when have the minute details of
any health examination procedure been
relevant news?"
And I answer, "since people ceased
to blush at the mention of the word
vagina."
Or perhaps Dobson and Warlick still
feel some kind of Puritanical shame
about their own anatomies that prevents
them from direct discussion of genita
lia. I would like to think that this is not
the reason, and maybe I have just missed
their point entirely.
In any case, I completely disagree
with their conclusion, and I applaud the
DTH for its revealing coverage of a
medical issue that continues to be fright
ening for a lot of women. In order to
stop women from dying of cervical can
cer, we must, as a society, get over our
hang-ups about our gonads and get rid
of the mystery surrounding a life-saving
medical procedure.
EMILY WALSH
Sophomore
Biology
Ad for unethical women's
center should be pulled
To the editor:
Mr. Wallsten, I was extremely irri
tated this morning to open up my DTH
and find yet another advertisement for
the Triangle Women's Health Center.
This ad upset me because, Mr. Wallsten,
as you are more than fully aware, this
organization is run in a highly unethical
manner.
The owner (and former lead doctor)
is currently serving a prison term, and
his son, the business manager, is also
facing such a term for tax evasion and
money laundering. The people in ques
tion are Dr. William Brenner and his
son Bill Brenner, Another son, Brian,
who is a graduate student at UNC, also
works in this disreputable center. The
center is currently under investigation
for lying about the ages of fetuses so
that they could exploit their customers
by pumping up the price of abortions.
Mr. Wallsten, a friend of mine in
formed you of all this, as well as of a
blind report issued against one of Dr.
Brenner's sons, and asked you to stop
running the ads so as not to lead the
"girls" of UNC into such a den of crimi
nals. "Women," you corrected, as well
you should have. But one aspect of
political correctness which you seem to
have completely missed is that using
respectful words for groups of people
should be out of ACTUAL RESPECT
for that group of people.
Mr. Wallsten, it is more than clear by
the persistence of these ads that your
respect for the female population on
this campus takes a back seat to The
Daily Tar Heel's almighty advertising
revenues.
Let me remind you that women helped
elect you to the position that you now
hold and that you have a duty to act
responsibly toward them in light of this
news, which you know to be true. I hope
that you will do so in the future.
EMILY FOX
Senior
International studies
Letters policy
The Daily Tax Heel welcomes
reader comments and criticisms. We
attempt to print as many letters to'the
editor as space pmniis. When writ
ing letters.please follow these guide
lines: Letters should be limited to 400
words. Shorter letters have a better
chance of running.
: Ifyouwantyourletterpublished,
sign, and date it, No more than two
signatures.
All letters must be typed and
double-spaced,
Include your year in (school, ma
jor, phone number and hometown.
If you have a title relevant to
your letter's subject, please include
it
The DTH reserves the right to
edit letters for space, clarity and vul
garity. .