Man Accused Of Murder Waives First Hearing Charlie Lowery, of Rt. 1. Red Spring!, waived a preliminary hearing in District Court Friday on a charge of murder and was bound over to Superior Court for action by the grand jury. He was ordered held without bond by .Judge George Stuhl, who presided over the court session. Lowery is accused of shooting Merle Cox of Shannon on Oct. 11. Lowery was represented in court by public defender Sol Cherry. James Isaac Melton ol Lumber Bridge appealed a conviction of speeding 70 in a 55 mph /one and driving under the influence. He was sentenced to 4 months suspended foi two years on the condition that he not drive for the next 12 months. He was fined SI00 and costs. The appeal bond was set at S300. Bobbv Revels and Donald Bat ton. both of Red Springs, were found not guilty ol injury^ to a building. Alton Bullard, ol Red Springs, who was charged with them, was found guilty and was sentenced to hO da\s in jail suspended and fined S10 and costs. He was also ordered to pay SI00 to The Johnson Compain for damages to tUeir building. Sands Phillips of Raetord pleaded guilty to public drunkenness and was sentenced to 20 days suspended upon Das mcnt of costs. Bond was ordered lorfeited by John Fairly of Raeford who w'as charged with no operator's license, exceeding a safe speed and improper registration and no liability insurance. The state took a nol pros at the request of the arresting officer in a charge against Wilber Farl Walket of Raeford of careless and reckless driving. Alexander Williams of Raeford pleaded guilty to reckless driving and was sentenced to 60 days suspended and lined S25 and costs Rodney Perry Provcaux of Aberdeen was lound not guilty of driving under the influence. The court denied a motion by the state to amend the warrant to include an additional charge of exceeding a safe speed and after hearing the evidence, on its own motion, charged the -defendent with a second count under General Statute 142A. He was found guilty ot exceeding a safe speed and was sentenced to 30 days suspended a:iJ fined S20 and costs. The state took a nol pros with leave for James Kenneth Pate of Raeford who was charged with unsafe movement Bur nice Locklear of Shannon pleaded guilty to public drunkenness and was sentenced to 20 days suspended upon pavmcnt of cost-. of court The state took a nol pros -on the condition that the defenden; make restitution in a case aga.r.st Jean Mabe ol Raeford who was charged with issuing a worthless check lor S3 to Robert Harrell Cecil Mabi. of Raeford was found guilt \ two counts ol issuing a worthless check to Robert Hart;!! ar.d was ordered to make restitution and pa> ?u?rt CO'In 1967 MERCURY Montclair 4 dr fully equipped was S1795 psmcl $I595 Raeford Auto Co. I Dialer Lie No. 13031 RAEFORD,N.C. MY CARD... It might coma In handy when you need Information about your security pro gram, your Social Security benefits, Accident and Health Ineurance or Re tirement Insurance. Better yet ... for the real thing write or phone: Jerry W. Qoza 821 E. Donald ton Ave. Phone 875-2926 o Metropolian Life York. N V Joe Earl Maynor of Raeford pleaded guilty to simple assault and was sentenced to 60 days suspended for two years on the condition that he not bother, molest or threaten his wife duirng that time. He was fined S10 and costs. Bond was ordered forfeited for Willie Alexander McRae of Fayetteville who was charged with driving under the influence. Henry Locklear of Shannon pleaded guilty to driving without a valid license and was sentenced to 30 days in jail suspended on the condition that he not drive until licensed to do so. He was fined SI 5 and costs. Lawrence Junior Locklear of Lumberton was fined S10 and costs for failing to drive on the right half of the highway. Bobby Daniel Hill of Racford pleaded guilty to driving under the influence. Ho was sentenced to six months suspended for two years on the condition that he not drive for the next 12 months. He was fined SI00 and costs. uaiucl Jacobs ol Shannon pleaded not guilty but was ? ouud guilts of driving under the influence, second offense He was sentenced to six months suspended for two years and ordered not to drive for 12 months. He was fined S-00 and costs. The state took a nol pros with leave f0, Thomas Alexander Hall of Shannon who was charged with failing to comply ?nh restrictions on his driver's liccnse. Con no 11 Easier ling of Kaetord was found not guilts of assault with a dcadls weapon. The prosecuting witness. Mrs. Carols., tasterhng. was found guilty of Irivilous and malicious prosecution and was fined SIO and court costs. Prayer for judgement was continued upon payment of court costs by Kenneth Rav Christian of Cameron who was charged with an inspection violation. Oscar Lee Baldwin of Raetord pleaded guilts to driving under the influence and was sentenced to six months suspended for two years and wis ordered lot to drive for the next 12 -nonths. He was fined S100 an?! costs. James Long of Racford was found guilty of simple assault, assault or an officer and resist ing arrest. He was sentenced on the assault charge to 30 days suspended for two years on the condition that he remain on good behavior and not violate the laws of the state for the next two years. He was charged court costs He received a sim,iar 30 dav sentence suspended for two years on the charges of assault on an officer and resisting arrest. The sentences are to run concurrently. Carl Virgil of Raeford pleaded not guilts but was lound guilts ot driving while lus license wJS suspended second offense He was sentenced to six months suspended tor two \ears on the condition that he not drive until licensed to do so. He was lined S250 and costs. MAGISTRATE court Alt ord Sullivan Bryson, f" a> e t teville. inspection violation, costs. N'c/er Mack. St. Pauls improper passing. $10 f,ne and costs. ?,Dan "cnr>' Hightower, arner Robbins. Fa., speeding 55 in a 45 mph zone. S5 fine and costs Knox Malloy Lewis, Red Springs, speeding 55 in a 45 mph /.one, S5 fine and costs. Edward Harold Bishop. Limerick, Pa., speeding 60 in 50 mph /one, S5 fine and costs. Joseph Lupo. Raeford. worthless check for S25 to Robert Harrell. pay check and costs. Hertesene Mountrie Purcell, Raeford, failing to yeild right - of ? way, costs. Donald Wayne Jackson, Raeford. speeding 75 in a 60 mph /one, SIO fine and costs Hughie Waller Dallas, r ay et teviTle, allowing an unlicensed person to operate a motor vehicle. S25 fine, S6 tail fee, costs. Eugene Campbell, Raeford, public drunkenness, S5 fine, S6 jail fee and costs. Wyche Watts. Red Springs, public drunkenness. S3 jail fee and costs. Gwendolyn Chambers Fayetteville, speeding 75 in a 60 mph zone. $10 fine and costs. Ramon Cruz Justiniano Fayetteville, inspection violation, costs. Billy Paul Stamatis, Macon Ga? speeding 55 in a 45 mph zone, S5 fine and costs. William Jesse Faircloth, Fayetteville, improper registration, costs. Emanuel McKayhan, Southern Pines, failing to drive on the right half of the highway, costs. George Edward Boyer, Fayetteville, speeding 70 in a 60 mph zone, SS fine and costs. Ethan Chavis, Maxton, failing to drive on the right half of the highway, costs. Dennis McGregor, Raeford, speeding 55 in a 45 mph zone, costs. Earnest Locklear, Shannon, exceeding a safe speed, costs. Freddie Revel, Jr., St. Pauls, improper muffler cutouts, costs. John Lee Hines, Raeford failing to stop for stop light, costs. 2/Lt. Howard L Bullock, Ft. Bragg, improper passing, $10 fine and costs. Frances Elizabeth Mclnnis, Rockingham, speeding 75 in 60 mph zone, S10 fine and coats. George Nicholson, Raeford, tires with less than 2/32 inch of tread, costs. Lorraine Graham, Raeford,' speeding 75 in a 60 mph zone, $10 fine and costs. Bobby Lee Wallace, Raeford, speeding 55 in a 45 mph zone, S5 fine and costs. James Rossi Shaw, Raeford, no chauffeur's license, $25 fine and costs. Claiming Dependents Is Taxing Question (Editor's Note: This is the thud and final article in a series J e v o t e d to problems encountered by taxpayers in claiming exemptions and dependents on their federal tax returns. It a question remains unanswered. you aie invited to send your questions to: Public Information Officer. Internal Revenue Service. 320 South Ashe Street. Greensboro. North Carolina 27402. who will reply promptly.) Your dependent must be a L nited States citi/en or resident, or a resident of Canada. Mexico, tlic Panama Canal Zone or the Republic of Panama lor sonic part of the \ear you claim she deduction. For I'nited States citizcns living abroad who legally adopt a child who is not a'I'nited States citizen, a dependency deduction is allowable for the hiId altei he has lived with the taxpayers for an entire tax year. Foreign students who maintain a home with Lime J States citizens under the Inter national Education tx change Seivice are not generally I nited States residents and may not be claimed as dependents. (However, if the student is below college level, you may deduct the amount you paid tor the student's maintainence in your home as a contributu n under itemized deductions ) MULTIPLE StPPORT AGREEMENT In some cases, no one person contributes more than one - half the support of a dependent, and. under the general rule ot chief support, nobody could claim that person as a dependent. Tlus inequity was corrected a lew years ago with the provision for the Multiple Support Agreement. In such cases, if a dependent receives more than one ? half lus support from a group.:-e ot whom furnishes ovet !aii support, but all furnish ni-jic than 10 f ot the dependent* support, any one of the grouts may claim the deduction provided the others sign Multiple Support Agreement Form stating that they will not claim the dependent. These Forms (2021) must "he attached to the return ot the taxpayer claiming the dependent. The forms are available from an\ IRS of-'ice THE WAY IT WORks Example You. your brothei and your sister each furnished more than lO'V of youi mother s support during the year. The total support all three of you furnished equalled 60<* of her total support. In this case, either you. your brother, or your sister would be entitled to claim the mother's exemption provided the other two agreed, s gned the Multiple Support Agreement forms and gave them to you to attach to vour return. CLAIMING A NON-RELATIVE Not long ago a person could not be allowed as a dependent, regardless of the amount of support received from the taxpayer unless he met certain relationship tests This was changed a few years ago. Today, a non ? relative may qualify as your dependent if ail the other dependency tests are met, provided the dependent was a member of your household for the entire tax year. DIVORCED OR SEPARATED PARENTS One of the most vexing problems confronting tax auditors has been making a determination as to which divorced or separated parent is entitled <o claim their child or children as dependents. Some cases in the past have been almost impossible to solve IRS has attempted to alleviate this problem by Jetting forth specific guidelines as to which parent shall be recognized as the proper claimant. These rules applv only if divorced or separated parents, together, furnish more than one ? half the child's support for the calendar year, and if the child is in his parents" custody for more than hall the calendar year. Example: You have custody of your child for 10 months of the year, and your spouse has the child for the other 2 months. You and your former husband provide the child's total support. You are entitled to claim the child as a dependent. However, if, under these conditions, a third party furnishes over half the chilcTs support, you may not claim the child as a dependent. SPECIAL RULE The parent not having custody of the child (or having it for the lesser period) is entitled to the dependency deduction if: I He contributed at least $<?>00 towards the child's support during ;he year, and a written agreement between the parties specifies that he is entitled to the exemption: or, - He provided at least Si 200 support for the child (or children) for the calendar year and the parent having custody does not clearly establish that he provided a greater share of the child support. In cases involving the second exception (above) where the parent having custody claims that ^ the exception is not satisfied or claims to have furnished greater support, each parent is entitled to receive an itemized statement of the expenditures upon which the other parent bases his claim of support. Social Security News C.V. SHhLTON. I II LI) Rl PRLSI M aTIVL ?i* etteville Social Security Officc How old docs one have to be to receive Social Security benefits? There is stiil contusion on ihe answer to this vtuestion. Both men ifnd women have the right to receive retirement benefits as early as age 62. Only widows ma\ receive benefits at age 60 In both of these cases ? retirement benetits it age 62 or widow's benefits at age 60 - the individual must decide to take a smaller check at these ages or wait until an older age and get a larger check. At age 62, both men and women receive only 80 percent of the amount they would get if they waited until they reached age 65. What should they decide to do? Of course, the actual decision is up to the individual, but the basic statistic to consider is that a person who decides to receive his Social Security retirement check at age 62 is ahead, money - wise unless he is certain of living past age 77. This means if he receives checks beginning with age 62 and does not live past age 77, he would receive a total amount in benefits which would be larger than the total amount received if he waited until age 65 and received full benefits but did not live past age 77. The same number of years applies in the case of a widow, who at age 60, receives a reduced benefit as compared to what she would get if she waited to age 62 to get the full widow's benefit. The widow at age 60 is ahead for the first 15 years ? unless she were certain of living past age -5, she would be ahead money ? wise to take the widow's benefits at age 60 than waiting to age 62. For further information, please call us in Fayetteville at 483-2661. REMINDER OF SUMMER-WOk McPhaul, who claimed the earliest ripe watermelons in the county, also boasts of the last melons of the season. Here he shows a melon that he picked and cut on Oct. 14. A small child was teaiing her mother all afternoon for tome grapei. At bedtime the watched her small couain saying her prayers and asked for an explanation of these unfamiliar proceedings. The mother explained that her cousin was talking to God, asking him to bleu her family and make hae a good girl. Immediately the child went into her own room and shut the door so that she might uy her prayers. Upon emerging she said to her mother, "1 talked to God and he said 1 was a very good girl? and I could have a grape. We can overlook the little girl's childish attempt to use God for her purpose, yet at the same time we must acknowledge that there are many of us who are guilty ot much the same thing. Our own concept of prayer may not be much more mature than hers. Though prayer may be assumed to be one of the key resources of the Christian life, it is also the one which many have never mastered. We can understand the disciples' urgent plea, "Lord, teach us to pray," for we ourselves are often in the need of help and instruction in our life of prayer. Like his disciples we can learn much from both the manner and spirit in which Jesus prayed. One thing the disciples must have learned in time is that there is no single way to pray. The prayer life of Jesus was filled with variety. He prayed in lonely places apart from the crowds, he also prayed in public. He prayed as he knelt, or walked. He prayed aloud in words and he prayed silently. His prayers were both formal and informal. He prayed Homecoming Revival Set The Church of God of Prophecy will hold the annual homecoming service Sunday. A singing program will be held at 2 p.m. and a revival will be held the following week. The evangelist will be E.E. Jestes. Smokey Say it UN MUSTANG 8 tyl 2 it hardtop, automatic. Rati Sharp mm S2MS K& *2195 Raafatd AvtaCa. <Oaal?Ua.N?UMI AAEFORO, M.C. prayers of praise and thanksgiving and He prayed prayers of petition. He heard God's response and there were timet when there seemed to be no response. He prayed at t wedding feast and from the cross at his own execution. In Jesua' life prayer was many different experiences of communion with God. It la important that we too, like the disciples, learn that there is no one way to pray, no one reason for praying. There are times when we pray spontaneously as a need rises within us. There are other times when we pray by sitting and thinking in quiet. There are times when we must put our feelings into words and there are times when words will simply not serve our purposes. Sometimes we will feel we need to kneel but there will be other times when we may offer up a sentence prayer as we dash to some daily task. Sometimes our emphasis will be on "telling" him, and other times we will need to sit and "listen." There are many ways and means for prayer. Secondly, we will need to learn as Jesus' disaples learned that prayer is not so much a matter of persuading a reluctant God to do what we want him to do, but a matter of offering ourselves so that he may do with us as he desires to do. We will need to know as Jesus did that God doesn't have to be nagged into becoming concerned about our welfare. He is already concerned before we are and much more deeply than we can ever be. When Jesus gave his disciples what we call "The Lord's Prayer," it was not intended to be a prayer to be repeated endlessly, but a model. All the essential elements of prayer are found in those simple lines: adoration, submission, petition, repentance, and committment. Lord, teach us to pray like that! w ? ? This Is The Law RPf* ?yftafcartC- tM FAMILY CAR Jo* White permits hit eighteen year old son to use tfis family car on s date, me son, while carelessly and negligently operating the automobile, injures Sam Black. May Black recover from Joe White a judgment for the personal injuries he has sustained'' Yes. In North Carolina and a limited number of other states there has been adopted what is known as the "family purpose doctrine" in respect to automobiles. Under this doctrine, the owner of an automobile, which is furnished to the members of the owner's family for their convenience and pleasure, is held liable for the negligent acts of any member of the family who might be driving it for pleasure with the conscnt, express or implied, of such owner. The relationslup created is that of principal and agent, existing between the owner of the family automobile and the member of his family driving it. By placing the automobile at the disposal of the family, the owner makes the pleasure of the family his affair and burineaa. Sam Black should be able to recover damages from either Joe White or his son. A minor child is liable for the personal injuries he negligently causes another. The son is liable in this case because he is the actual wrongdoer, The father is liable because it was his agent that caused the injury. Bill Brown permits his eighteen year old son to use the family car for the purpose of attending a football game in Virginia. If the son negligently injures Tom Grey wihle driving the automobile in Virginia, could Tom Grey recover damages from Bill Brown? No. Virginia does not have the "family purpose doctrine" in respect to automobiles. In Virginia, the son would be liable but not the father. The District of Columbia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey are among "the other I1,500.000 I AMERICANS J ARE CURED I OF CANCER. > American , Cancer Society 1B8B MERCURY MONTEGO 4 dr. fully ? quippad w/?ir low mitoagt was $2695 ?S,lce$2495 Raeford Auto Co. IDuHr Lie. No. 1303) RAEFORD, N.C. jurisdictions that do not have the "family purpose doctrine." Tennessee, South Carolina, and Georgia, on the other hand, are among the jurisdictions that have adopted the doctrine. The liability of automobile owners is determined by the law of the state in which the accident occurs. 1B67 FAIRLANE 500 2 dr hardtop, fully aquipptd mi $1595 PRICE *1395 Raeford Auto Co. (Dollar Lie. No. 1303) RAEFORO, N.C. More space .less cost. Borco steal buildings save you up to 22% on total construction costs, compared to other quality, custom-engineered steel buildings. For fast faits, write or calli Barco Steel Corporation Box 270 Mooresville, N.C. 28115 Phone; 704/664-1219 (Vico The fungus of "athlete's foot" is widespread in lock er rooms. But the danger of contracting the infection is almost nil if the skin of your feet is heslthy and unbroken. Blisters open the door to athlete's foot, as does scraped skin. Avoid blisters and damaged skin and you usually avoid the lingering infection of ath lete's foot. t&rtup-Co-. COMPUTE PEST CONTROL Frtt Inspection Of Your Promises EXTERMINATE FOR ROACHES - RATS - TERMITES FUMIGATION Farm Chemical Inc. TELEPHONE 876 3964 Ramembar, dollars slip away easily, though guarded with a sharp ay* and a firm grip. But, when you pay all your bills by chack, you know where every cent goas. Lat a checking account help with your plans in tha future. The Bank of Raeford ?" , :*? . ' X - MAIM rTfttCT HA1FORD, N. C. SUNSET HILLS Diptilt Iwwf? Corporation HOME OWNED - HOME MANAGED - HOME MINDED

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view