Newspapers / The Elkin Tribune (Elkin, … / April 20, 1933, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of The Elkin Tribune (Elkin, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
Criminal Court Calendar April Term, 1933 SURRY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Monday, April 24th GOOD BEHAVIOR DOCKET No. I—State vs. Bill Callahan N o# 3—state vs. William Eaton (Col.) No. 4—State vs. Jesse Poore and Walter Bowman No. s—State5 —State vs. Porter Smith No. 7—State vs. Roy Simmons. No. B—State vs; Ed Davis, Jr., and Hugh Bowman No. 9—State vs. Lee Eldridge REGULAR TRIAL DOCKET No. 35 —State vs. Joe Childress, Indct., H. B. L. & R., Deft, in jail- r r . No. 84 —State vs. Andrew Gunter, Warrant, Murder, Deft, in jail. • . No. 89—.State Vs. Joe Yowe, Bound Over, H. B. L. & R., Deft, in jail. No. 102—State vs. Talmadge Dowell, Bound Over, Murder, Deft, in jail. No. 24—State vs. Arthur Martin and Millie Martin, Warrant, Tresp. No. 36 —State vs. Walter Akers, Warrant, H. B. L. &R. No. 37 —State vs. Lex Tate, Warrant, H. B. L. & R. No. 54—State vs. Marvin Shinault, Warrant, A. W. D. W. No. 55—State vs; Jim Johnson, Warrant, Breaking and Enter ing Dwelling. No. 60—State vs. Jim Norman, Warrant, Tresp. No. 75—State vs. James Parker, Warrant, Cutting Timber. No. 76 —State vs. James Parker, Warrant, Tresp. No. 82 —State vs. Andrew Reynolds, Warrant, Larceny. No. 83 —State vs. William Jessup, Warrant, Larceny. No. 85 —State vs. Dewey Evans, Warrant, Larceny. No. 86—State vs. Thomas Matthews, Warrant, Reckless Driv ing. No. 87 —State vs. Lacey Simpson, Warrant, A. W. D. W. No. 88 —State vs. Yancey Cobler, Warrant, A. W. D. W. No. 92—State vs. W. W. Poore, Bound Over, Breaking and En tering. No. 96—State,,vs. Floyd Harris, Warrant, B. P. L. No. 97—State vs. Ira Stokes, Warrant, V. P. L. No. 98—State vs. E. D. Short, Warrant, V. P. L. No. 99—State vs. C. W. Short, Warrant, V. P. L. No. 100 —State vs. Howard Holt, Warrant, Assault. t > Tuesday, April 25th No. I—State vs. Louis Clifton, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 2 —State vs. Cabel Forkner, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 3—State vs. C. B. Strange, Indct., A. W. D. W. No. 4—State vs. Bert Boyd, Appeal, Assault. No. s—State i Vp.,o. C- Thomas, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 6—State' vis. O. C. Thomas, Appeal, Disp. Mortg. Property. No. 7—State vs. Ellis Horton, Appeal, V. P. L. No. B—State vs. Ellis Horton, Appeal, Operating Car Reckless and V. 'P. L. . 1 ' ''* 1 No. 9—State ys., Ellis Horton, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 10 —State vs. C. N. Cook, Appeal, Violation of Town Ordi nance: !! 4 K No. 11—State vs. J. A. Atkins and R. L. Bennett, Appeal, Bad Check. No. 12 —State vs. R. J. Bennett, Appeal, Embezzlement. , • Wednesday, April 26th No. 13—State vs., J. H. White, Indct., A. W. D. W. No. 14—State 1 >vs; Roscoe Golden, Indct., Seduction. No. 15—State vs. Lester McArthur, Appeal, Assault. No. 16—State' vs. ; Zeb Hatcher, T. J. Hatcher and W. E. Hatch er, Violating Town Ordinance. No. 17—State 1 ' vis. W: H. Reid, Indct., A. W. D. W. No. 18—State' irs. Jack Hardy and Isaac Adams, Indct., Oper ating Qar While Intoxicated. No. 19 —State..,vi t „Pau} Dix, Appeal, V. P. L. , , No. 20—State.vs, Jewell Hemric, Indct., Setting Out, Fire. No. 21—State vs. D. H. Lovelace, Appeal, Bad Check. No. 22—State vs. Boyd Cain, Raymon Cain, Mosps Owens and, Otto Cook, Indct., L. & R. * '!»•#! . . ■■ i | '"' • Thursday, April 27th No. 26—State vs. Cleve O'Neal and R. L. Wall, Indct. V. P. L. No. 27—State vs. Henry Gallaway, Col., Appeal, A. W., D. W. No. 28—State,vs.'!,pred Mills, Indct., Manslaughter. No. 29—State ,vs,. Rubey Hensley and Rufus C. Stanley, Appeal, Cohabit. No. 30 —State vs. Ivey Gallaway, Indct., False Pretense. No. 31—State vs. Clifford Crissman, Indct., Manslaughter. No. 32—State vs. B. Payne, Carl Freeman, Wesley Cave, John Collins and Dixon Collins, Indct., V. P. L. No. 33.—State vs. Arthur Martin and John Martin, Appeal, Tresp. No. 34—State y?/ W. H. Atkins, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 38—State ys. J. W. Lovill, Appeal, Violation of Town Ord. No. 39—State vs. Roosevelt Gentry, Indct., Assault and Bat tery! j\ . No. 40—State VS. Roosevelt Gentry, Indct., Abandonment. j . Friday, April 28th No. 41—State vs. Arthur Harris, Appeal, Injury to Real Estate. No. 57.—State Vs. Arthur Harris, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 58—State vs. Arthur Harris, Appeal, A. W. D. W. No. 42—State vs. Mattie Bell Carpenter, Appeal, D. and D. No. 43—State vs. Raphiel Crawford, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 44—State vs. D. H. Crawford, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 45—State vs. H. C. Vernon, Appeal, Bad Check. No. 46—State vs. T. L. Dockery, Appeal, Bad Check. No. 47—State vs. Stoffel Burton, Appeal, Prostitution and Assignation. No. 48—State vs. Edward Miller, Appeal, L. &R. i m vv • Monday, May Ist No. 49—State vs. Roy Cook, Indct., Seduction. No. 50—State' VS. Richard Butcher, Appeal, V. P, L. V No. 51—State vs. Dennis Kirkman, Appeal, Assault.;, No. 52—State ,vs. Everett Danault and Lester Towe, Appeal, A. W. D. W. No. 53—State.vs. Arthur Towe, Appeal, Op. Car While Intox.r No. 56—State vs. Alice Harris McCraw, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 59—State'vs. Arnold Easter, Appeal, V. P. L.' No. 61—State vs. Herbert Cook, Indct., H. B. L. &R. No. 62—State vs. Cletus Snow, Indct., V. P. L. No. 63—State vs. Bufford Clifton, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 64—State, vs. Ernest Gwyn, Col., Appeal, A. W. D. No. 80—State vs. Alice McCraw, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 81—State vs. Arnold Easter, Appeal, V. P. L. Tuesday, M»y 2nd No. 65—State vs. Carl (Paul) Boderiheimer, Iridct., Op. Car THE ELKIN TRIBUNE. ELKIN. NORTH CAROLINA While Intoxicated. No. 66—State vs. Elmer Simpson, Indct., V. P. L. No. 67—State vs. William H. Mays, Indct., V. P. L. No. 68—State vs. Bishop Bowden, Indct., Larceny. No. 69—State vs. Dock Golden, Indct., V. P. L. No. 70—State vs. Norman (Monk) Harkrader and Ralph Coal son, Indct., H. B. L. & R. No. 73—State vs. J. C. Mills, Indct., False Pretense. No. 74—State vs. Prince Worrell, Indct., Burning Car. No. 77 —State vs. James Parker, Appeal, Cutting Timber. No. 78 —State vs. Clyde Forkner, Appeal, Op. Car While Intox. Wednesday, May 3rd No. 79—State vs. Charlie Branson, Appeal, D. &D. No. 90—State vs. Clyde Monday, Appeal, Reckless Driving. No. 25—State vs. H. W. Lewis, Appeal, Op. Car While Intox. No. 91—State vs. E. M. Dougherty, Appeal, V. P. L. No. 93—State vs. Gassie Griffie, Appeal. V. P. L. No. 94—State vs. Ellis Horton, Appeal, V. P. L. No. * ,95—State vs. F. R. (Reggie) Jones, Appeal, Op. Car While Intox. No. 101—State vs. Bob Williams, appeal, V. P. L. ;J Thursdav, Mav 4th SCIFA DOCKET No. I—State vs. W. B. Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings .. worth, Surety. No. ' 2—State vs. W. B. Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings worth, Surety. n II I u AllH'Elll! '"I I mini"'"""" 1 "I'M""'" """' '""» II UM .immumi • im mi ,• u 1 1 1/ 'nllHWiillHllflllllßllim 111 pig!' 1 I n I f Nature's Own 1| I j_ Refrigerant! || _L Manufactured From Pure Deep Well Water To The Public: ' USERS OF ICE 1 We solicit your patronage and co-operation in giving you better Ice service. In case you do not T|^ get efficient service and courteous treatment, JL JL T ▼ •• • kindly notify the management. For the conven fence of our patrons, and for ourselves, we ask 1 ™ that you use our ice cards which we gladly furnish o ut of order. free of charge. To those who care to take ad , « i -i i*i 1 That ice contains no coils to be de -vantage of our coupon books, which are now on I froßted regu|arly and that ice does Sale, will be a considerable saving as well as con- prevent, through its melting process, the venience as on our coupon books you can save contamination of odors and flavors of r pptil- various foods in the refrigerator which ' pass out through the melting drain. We invite you to visit our plant and see for your- o That ice refrigerators cost less than self the pains we take to manufacture pure, clean any other form—less for the refrig deep well water ice. As we are one of you, and erator, less for daily operation, less for j, . . i i i i t-,11 • interest and depreciation and nothing for you one 01 us, patronize us and help keep Elkm repairs, money at home. 4 That commercial ice, which takes from 48 to 60 hours to freeze, is rc W f L clearer, harder and purer than home-made JL aJL V/i f-Lfl ice that is frozen in a few hours time. r That ice is absolutely silent, no hum W* O of motor or rattle of moving parts. A! £ That the.Carolina Ice and Fuel Com -0 pany wiil deliver every da£ in the year with pure ice that assures you al ways of full weight. Not melted down on OUR TRUCKS ARE NOW MAKING DAILY DELIVERIES ... SAFETY FOR FOODS! . > V " . 4 i Carolina Ice & Fuel Co. ELKIN, N. C. No. 3 —State vs. W. B. 'Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings worth, Surety. No. 4—State vs. W. B. Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings worth, Surety. No. s—State vs. W. B. Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings worth, Surety. No. 6 —State vs. W. B. Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings worth, Surety. No. 7—State vs. W. B. Hollingsworth and J. W. Hollings worth, Surety. No. B—State vs. Blaine Norman and A. H. Castevens, Surety. No. 9—State vs. Andrew White and W. M. White, Surety. No. 10—State vs. F. A. White and W. M. White, Surety. No. 11—State vs. Loyd White and William White, Surety. No. 12—State vs. J. L. White and William White, Surety No. 13—State vs. Draton May berry and J. F. Kirkman, Surety. No. 14 —State vs. Fred Payne and W. B. Carpenter, Surety. No. 15 —State vs. Herbert Brinkley and Robert Brinkley, Surety. No. 16.—State vs. Jack Hardy, Isaac Adams and Floyd Mooney, Surety. No. 17—State vs. George CaUahan and Ed Woodruff and J. S. Suratt, Sureties. No. 18—State vs. Porter Tickle and Luther Tickle, Surety. No. 19—State vs. General W. Tilley and Jas. T. Henley and R. J. Hill, Sureties. No. 20—State vs. Mrs. Cabel Forkner and Sallie M. Forkner, v- 4 Surety. (Continued on Last Page) Thursday, April 20, 1933
The Elkin Tribune (Elkin, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
April 20, 1933, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75