weekly Perspective Qther views \ ? Our agriculture is on a diet i * / V By JOHN SLEDGK For the first time ia a tew year*. M wfll to able to say that U.S. lawm are aot producing record ?raps this year. TMak of It as agriculture oa a diet. More than half of the aatko'a farms are earoUed la various acreage reduction programs to tahe aore than a third o i the aattoa's cropland for wheat, feed graima, rice and cotton out of The Payment-In-Kind program, Which returns surplus commodities to farmers for leaving cropland idle, waa first detailed by President Reagan at the American Farm Bureau Federation annual meeting laat January In Dallas. PIK was stalled in Congress at the time, but the President announced to the Farm Bureau that he was going ahead wttL it Reagan rightly sur mised that agriculture couldn't wait another year. And, he received the enthusiastic support of thousands of farmers at that meeting. While some thought that interest might wane, it did not, and the result, was' a tremendous participation in acreage reduction. PIK has already helped the farmers. Prices, especislly for corn, have climbed steadily since January, this yesr's production at corn may be the smallest since WT5, and teed grain stocks could be cut by 3) percent. Wheat production will probably be the lowest since ltTt. That doesn't mean we are in danger of running short of grain. We have more than enough even with PIK. But, after several years of steady diet of big crops, agriculture is going on a diet. Instead of carrying all that weight around in surplus stocks, we are going to see a leaner crop sector, and that's going to be healthier for the whole farm economy, as well as for consumers. F acts need to be explained Contrary to the old saying, (acts do ?at speak for themselves. Facts cannot simply stand alone, and many are incomprehensible without in terpretation. Historical research