Newspapers / The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, … / July 2, 1908, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
b , . i - i CHARLOTTE JDAILY OBSERVER, JTJLY-2,-1903.V, h J i 4 -Ik 7; ME UWESlOFiN ApS (Continued from Pae Onfl). Ututloa la written. "To what purpose are powers limited, aqd to what pur post U that UmlUtlon committed to writing,' if. tW ll'mita ' may. at any time ba paed by those-' IntendedMo be restrained? The distlaction v be- . ,nnmt with limited and . fcTtt 55 BT' ,' - - Jin limit muh ia'atin'Hs&d. If 'lllOSS limits d. not confias the-person; . ;vhm they ere imposed. and if act 1 prehlbitedvand i aeu allowed . are I euat obligation, i It "la, a. proposition too plain to be contested, that the cot)' stitutioa control -any legislative ait repugnant to it; orMhat the Ieglsla ture .may. alter the'Oonstltutlon by an ordinary met. Between- these alterna- -tlvea Ahgre is no gnome grounq. uu (constitution Is either a superior, para mount law. unchangeable by ordinary means, or It la on a level with ordinary legislative acta, ana, ne ouier acia, i altomable, when Legislature aball Judge C. A. Moore, President plea to alter it. If the former part ef the alternative be true, then a leg islative act contrary to the constitu. Don la not law; It ths latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power, in its own Da tura illimitable. FUNDAMENTAL LAW. "Certain) all those wha htave framed written constitutions contem plate them as fosralng the fundsmanU mrana paramount law or tne nation, and. coaseaaently. the.fheory of every tOh government munt be, that an act of the Legislature, repugnant to the constitution, ia void. This theory is es sentially attached to a written con stitution, and is consequently to be considered by this court as one of the fundamental principles of our socie ty. It is not. therefore, to be lost sight of In the further consideration ef this subject If an act of the Leg islature, repugnant to the constitution, Is void, does it, notwithstanding Its Invalidity, bind the courts, aaid oblige them to give it effect? Or, in other words, though it be nit law, does It constitute a rule an operative as If It was a law? This would be to over throw In fsot what was established In theory; and would seem, at flret view, .anabsurd)ty too grog to be Insisted on. It shall, however, receive a more attentive consideration. "It Is. emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial department to eay what the law la. , Those who apply the rule to particular casea mum, of necessity, expound and Interpret that rule. If two conflict with each Other, the court must rtorlde on the operation of each, fco If a law be in opposition to the constitution; If both the law and. the coruilltutlnn apply to a, particular cac, bo that the court must either decide that case conform ably to the law. disregarding the oon stltutkm, or comforniably to the con sUtutisn, disregarding the law; the s- :-(. ?; 'court must determine which of these f conflicting rule governn the cae. This f ' 4 is ths very essence of Judicial duty ' , Jf. then, the courts are to regard the . aonstltution, and the constitution is '- i superior to any ordinary act of the v-..-ll1slaturs, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the ... ". tasa o which they hoth apply. - li -; WBITTEN CONSTITUTIONS. "Those, then, who controvert the principle that the constitution Is to btoonsldered in courts ss a paramount law. Are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close theLr eyes on the constitution and sea eniy Che law. This doctrine would sub vert the very foundation of all wrlt- ' ten constitutions. It , would declare that an act, which, according to the ' principles and "theory of our govern " menl, Ts entrrelyolaTTsyel In'prac- . tlce completely obligatorj'. It woull declare that If the Legislature shall be ' what Is expraasiy forbidden! such act - nsrwlthsLandJng the express prohlbl . . tlpn. ia, In reality, rflectual- It would ,' be giving to the Lt'glalatures a prac ; tical and real omnipotence with the earns breath which profeasee to ra atrtct their powers within narrow lim its. It ts prescribing limits, end de clarlag that those limits may be pase- ed at pleasure. That It thua reduces to notblnjt what we have deemed the "ereateat Impreveweirt on politioal ln- etltutions a. a written copstllutioB-? ' would 0 itself be suflicient In America, : where written constitutions have been , viewed wjth to much, reverence, for re- jectler the-eonstmctionrButme p- ; cu liar.' expressions of, the constitution ef the. United States furnish additional - arguments in favor of its rejection. rTb Judicial power of the United - .'fitntes la extended to ail caees arising . under the constitution. Could It be lbs Intention of those who gave this CHAMEERLAiy g COLIC. --CHOLEHA AND DIARRHOEA BKMKDI WOVVD " Ta 1903 J had ev very vere attack of dtarrnoea4"'sys JL N, frrar,i of- Cat " JUnd. ' t. Tor several weeks I wsa vrable to do-any thing. On March. Uth. Ki. I h4 a e!mi:sr ttack nd took , Chmbn.n's Coin, ' Cholera and Di arrnoe Bmify which gave me prompt r I eots4r it ens el the beet medi c f-.s iit kind in ths' world, and had I v d it la r 1 h.,v u would have sav ' 1 r a t'"l dells OpctOr'S - kill.'' ; .i . u Jw-'n st.ee -r i sower to say. that, in using it, the con ltutlon should not be lookedint r that a cbm arising under ine con stitution should toe deefded wtthout ex amining the Instrument under which it arises? This is toe extravagant wj maintained.' ' f :. f'.: - The constitution of . the y- United States ha been the suprwsne law for more than a century; and during- all of this time the Supreme Court has, .h.. tt.. nmtiffn,-ln"i ftfn brought before It for determination, exercised thatupowar of declaring the legislation of- the "Congress of, tne United States unconstitutional, as Well as hat of the Statea, whenever It was found to con flict with the constitution of the Unit ed .States. The highest courts of the States have followed the Supreme Court of the United States in thia eon HtpiMInn e,f?p-m irnnstltntion: :tn "fact, the Supreme' Court of the United States was not the first to decide that the Judiciary la empowered to declare unconstitutional and void legislation .which contravened the constitution. of the State Bar Association. The courts of New Jersey were the first, perhaps, to announce thin prin ciple, but there shortly followed the courts of Virglnis, South Carolina. Rhode Island, .Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Nothing can ho better set tled In eur own State than the prin ciple announced in the c'aaa of Mar bury versus Madison. It was first held In this State, In the esse of Bayard versus Slnglston, a N. C. 48, snd has been ever Since constantly adhered to, and tfis'powef "e"aercTiea on all occa sions where the question has arisen and It was found that legislation con travened tbe constitution. IN THE MOTT CASE. In the case Jf Mott verxus Commis sioners. 12 N. C, 8SJ, the Supreme Court of this State said: . "Where an act of the Legislature la In conflict with the terms of the constitution, they cannot hoth stand; one must give way to the other; and at the constitution is superior to the legislative act, the latter mut give way to the former. 'It la a proposition too plain to be contested, that the con stitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it.' Marhury versus Mad ison. 1 Craneh, t9. But wc do not think It necessary at this late day for '- ' I V - f I ' " V iw.': r t -f ". .. ... :r. y ' - . . 3 ''t'v - "V-- . I t 0 Aaaonlate JnMloe O. A. Woods, of t us to undertake to establish the prop osition that the constitution la supe rior to ordinary legislative acta and that when they conflict the latter must yield to the .former." Mr. Webater. in speech delivered in the United States Senate, upon this question,-most clearly andconvlnciniL- ly ssld: "The people, then, sir, erected tnu government They gave It It constitu tion. nd In that constitution they have enumerations powers which they be stow on It They. baa,7nade It a lim ited roverdmentv - They have defined Us authority, Th-ev restrained-!! to ihe exercise of such ipowers as f granted; and all others they: declare, are reserved to the States of the peo- pie mn, sir. UiiXSmtjoiiMi3EB5ia. here. If they had. they would nave accomplished but half their work. No definition can be so else as to avoid possibility of doubt; no limitation precise as to exclude all uncertainty. Who. then, aball construe thla grant of h people?. Who shall Interpret their wijl where It may Ds supposed tncy havs left It doubtful? With whom do I " ' 11 . , . "" M' ' '"" 'I ' .'li 'li" n in li. Ill I ii i Ithey epp ttajigt Pt elding-on the powers of the overn mawt? Sir, they have settled all this Jn theifuliest manner, .They have left it. with the government, itself, in Its appropriate branches. - Elr the very chief end.' the main design, for which the' whole constitution ? was framej and. adopted, was tO(,estabHsh a gov ernment that should not be obliged to act through State agency, or depend on State opinion' and State discretion. Th,a people, jhd 1 f'lta enough of lhat kind of government under the Confederacy.;' Under that system tne legal action the application of law to Individuals, belonged. exclusively to the Statea. Congreas could only .rec ommend heir acts were not of bind ing force. till the States had adopted and sanctioned them. Are we In that condition still? Are we yet at the merry" of . State discretion and SUtepfc whole court, -Mr. Justice Brewer . . . . ii t -I AmU iwrliirg nn w mi nf Vi lrmrt construction? Sir. If we are. then vain will be our attempt to maintain the constitution under which we sit. WISE PROVISION OF PEOPLE. "But sir, the people have wisely provided in the constitution Itself, a proper, suitable mode and tribunal for settling questions of constitutional law. There are. In the constitution, grants of power to Congress, and re strictions on these powers. There are, alsoT pTohtbTTKffii-6hth 3tScer-Sorae f authority must, therefore, necessarily exist, having tbe ultimate Jurisdiction to fix and ascertain the Interpretation of these grants, restrictions, and pro hibitions. The constitution has Itself pointed out ordained and established that authority. How has it accom plished this great and essential end? By declaring, sir, that, 'the constitution and the lawa of the United States made In pursuance thereof shall be the su preme law of the land, anything In tne constitution or laws of any Stats to the) contrary notwithstanding,' "Thla, sir, was the first great step. By this the supremacy of the consti tution snd laws pf the United States Is declared. The people so will It. No State law. is. to be valid which comes In conflict with the constitution or any law of the United States passed In pursuance of tt But who shall decide this question of interference? To whom lies the last appeal? This, sir, the constitution Itself decides, also, by declaring 'that the Judicial power shall extend to all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States.' Thse two provisions, sir. cover the whole ground. They are, In truth, the keystone of the arch. With these, it Is a constitution; without them it is a confederacy. In pursu ance of thess clear and. express pro visions. Congress established at its very first session. In tbe Judicial act. a mode for carrying them Into full effect, and for bringing ail questions of constitutional pewer to the final de- rlHnn,fltthfl. .Sunrfema.caurU sir. became a government. It then Had the means of self-protection; and but foe this it would, in all probabili ty, have been now among things which are past. Having constituted the gov ernment, and declared Its powers, the people have further said that since somebody must decide on the extent of these powers, the government shall It self decide; subject, always, like other bllity to the people." CLOTHED WITH FULL AUTHORITY From ths, foregoing one must con clude. I think, that the Federal courts are -clothsd bjt the- .constitution -of- the United States and the legislation of the Congress of the United States, en acted In pursuance thereof, with Ju risdiction to determine the question of th constitutionality of the act of the North Carolina Legislature, fixing the maximum rates of charges for trans portation of passengers snd freights. Being clothed with this Jurisdiction, a Federal court could not shrink from the duty Imposed upon It to decide the question. It could not closs its doors to ths citizen demanding his rights, because, perhaps, ths persons alleged to withhold his rights preferred anoth er tribunal. As said by Mr. Justice Harlan In the "Nebraska Maximum Rate Cases," speaking for the unani mous court: "But despite the dtfflcul tir that confessedly attend the prop. or solution of such questions, the -if Vs. ht ' tit f ' ,f , "- " ' he South Carolina Supreme Court, court cannot. shrink from the duty to determine wivether It be true, as al leged, that the Nebraska statute In vades or destroys rights secured by the supreme taw of the land. No one, we take it. will contend that a State en uctntent is in harmony' with, that law flmnlyberausa the Legislature of 4h Htate has declared such to be the ca tor that would make the State Legls lature the final Judge of the validity of Its enactment, although, the consti tution of the United States and the laws, made In pursuance thereof are the supreme law of the land, anything in therebnstltutlon or laws of sny State to the eontrary notwithstanding. Th a idea. that any Legislature. State or Federal can conclusively deter mlnr for tfts people and for tha oiiri i)m what it .enacts in the form Of law, bt what It authorises Its agents to do, is eonalaltnt with the fundamental law, la In opposition to the' theory of cur institutions.- The duty rests upon all courts. Federal and Stater when their Juried iction is properly Invoked, to see to It that no right- secured by the su preme taw of ths land ts Impaired or destroys! by; legislation. Shis fuse- J ... : tlon a.nd duty of the Judiciary distin guishes the American system from all other , systems of - government' The perpetuity df our Institutions and the liberty which la enjoyed under -them, depend, i la-no email degree, upon the power glveni the judiclary-toydeclare null" and void all legislation that is clearly repugnant to the supreme- law ot the landj" V: - '-' . ; -'.. POWER OF STATES LIMITED. It la now thoroughly well eatab Usbed that the power of the States to regulate and limit passenger and freight rates ia not2" power to de stroy, nl limitation Is not the equiv alent of confiscation." In tbe case of Reagan versus Farmers' Loan Sc. Trust Company, lit U. S.. Ml, thia doctrine was clearly and distinctly declared by delivering the oplnlonnfthe-ronrt; and In ihs caae of Covington.- etc.. versus Sanfordv lit U. 8.. 67s,- Mr. justice narian, speaking also ior an unanimous court, said, "there la rem edy In ths courts for relief against leg islation .establishing a tariff of rates which: is so unreasonable as to prac tically destroy the value of the. proper ty of companies engaged In tbe carry ing business, and that especially may tha courts of the . United States treat suCFquesUouVaaimiroBev-and hold such acts of legislation to be In conflict with the cqnstltution of the United States, aa depriving the com panies of their property without due process of law, and as depriving them of tha equal protection of the law. The Circuit courts of the United States have Jurisdiction ot controver sies between citizens of different States where the Jurisdictional amount la in volved, or where the case itself arises under ths constitution cfr- laws of the United States. Cases are held to arise under tha constitution or laws of the United Statea when it appears from the questions Involved that some right will be defeated by one construction of the constitution or sustained by anoth er construction. Unquestionably, then, the United States Court had Juriadic tion of the i contrdversybetween "the railroad companies find the ' officials of the Stats. It is true that the rail road companies could have prosecuted their suit In the State courts, as the Stats courts had. Jurisdiction concur rent with the United Statea Circuit Court, but where the Jurisdiction of the State and Federal courts is concur rent, the litigant has the legal right, which cannot upon any ground, be de nied him, to Institute his action In elther-court as he prefers. The court selected cannot exclude htm. In fact, the eourt selected could be compelled, by writ of mandamus, to entertain Ju risdiction of the action were It to re fuse to exercise it It will be a calam- lty. Indeed, if the courts of the coun- ItTJt&aikiJJXJsaAda&A open, can turn away those who seek the enforcement of their rights in them. COURTS MUS TFACE ISSUE. As said by Chief Justice Marshall, in Cohen vs. Virginia, 6 Wheat.. 284, "It Is most true that this court will not take Jurisdiction if It should not; but It is equally true that It must take Jurisdiction if it should. The Judiciary cannot, as the Legislature may, avoid a measure because It approaches the confines of the constitution. We can not pass it by because it Is doubtful. I With whatever doubts, with-whatever dlnioultles, a case msy be attended, i must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of Jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which Is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may ocour which we. would gladly avoid, but we cannot'avold them. All we can do is to sxerclse our best Judg ment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. This language Is quoted in ths opln ion in the case Ex 'Parte, Ybung, known as the "Minnesota Case." re ported In Advance Sheets, Opinions United States Supreme Court,. No. 10 page 447, adopted by the Supreme Court as the opinion of the court In the case of Hunter vs. Wood. In that case Mr. Justice Peckham rendering the opinion ot the court, ssld JURISDICTION A DELICATE MAT TER 'The question of Jurisdiction, wheth er of the Circuit Court or of thia court Is frequently a delicate mater to dal with, and It Is especially so In this case where Vie most important ob jection to the Jurisdiction of the Cip cult Court Is he assertion that the suit i is, in enect, 'against one or the Ktatf-s of the Union. It is a question, how ever, which we are called upon, and which it is our dirty to decide." The contention that ih ...it insti tuted on the equity side of the docket In the United Ktates Circuit Court by the rsllroada against the officials of the State, was, in effect, a suit against the State, has been so thoroughly (an swered by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Ex Parte, Young, above lted. that. I only wish to refer. to It It Is noteworthy that the opinion written . by Mr. Justice Peckhsjn in that case was concurred In by seven of the Justices of the court and that it was dissented" from by only one of the Justices of the court. It is further worth while, sa showing the! non-political character of the discus sion, that the oplnion-n that case wa! Wr4tten by Mr, Justlee Peekham, a uemacrat, and mat it was concurred f court, Democrat and Republican, ex cept Mr. Justice Harlan, a Republican.! ;o on. it seems to me. sfter unbi ased roilectlon, can attach. blame tj ins iiuimaa companies ror going, as they certainly had the legal as well as the moral right to do, Into the Federal! court to rtaVe their rights adjudicated Xo one i-Rn attach blame to the Feder al court for permitting the ease, to be Instituted In that court; it was lts.duty io no ii, ana it could not. besides, pro vent It. It made no difference, in fact to, the defendants where the suit was brought, as, In any event it had to be finally determined In the United Statea Supreme Court the arbiter of the con troversy, made such by the constitution of the United 8 tales, the supreme law ot tne land; particularly. Is this true, aa by Instituting tbe action In the United States Circuit Court the final disposition or tha case would be quick- er- reecnea. THE YOUNO DECISION. A careful study of the opinion ot the Supreme Court in Ex Parte Young, made the opinion of the court in the caae or Hunter, Sheriff, versus Wood, one of the Xorth Carolina rate cases, ought to. snd will. I believe, aa aeon CS sufficient time shall have rts nee rn permtt impartial consideration of . it auair -me puonc mind, as well as ...t m vui proression. or tnecpjtacU ,,'n J"'1 aepart ht exactly minutes II ons ol Dr. Snoop's Pink Pain Tablets 1s taken. - Pain anywhere. Ram ember! paw always means .congestion, blood pressors; toothache la blood- treasure on ! I!LUv n,rT- Dr. Snoop's : Head- ' .7 o can en ram Pain Telets-o.ulckly and safely coax thu blood pressure away, from pain centres. Pm!".fW J?K3 gt metant rjjHef. 9) Tablsta , - Bold bs Mullen's m a vj . -4 ness of the principles there decidedJ and applied-.. -a - - -. -We can. therefore, take It. that the important -questions involved In these, litigations ' are forever ; settled. They have not iteen eetlled. It. may be, as some of us thought they ought to have been, but I believe as timepassea on the people, and' more particularly the legal profession.", will see that they have been settled right ..REPORT OF COMMITTEE. - Chairman' Womack reported for the executive committee that it had met at Raleigh last January and se lected Merehead City aa the meeting place and had chosen Associate Jus tice Charles A. Woods, of the South Carolina Supreme Court to deliver ths annaal address and that be was pres ent Applause: greeted thla annotince tngntt.i3ialrjaanWomtck further stated that Theodore F. Davidson had been selected to apeak on "Memories of the Western Bar." and A. M. Wad dell on that of tha east but neither could be present and that Z. V. Wal aer would speak on "Wit and Humor of ths Bar." It was announced that Judge Connor would speak In Ueu of Colonel Davidson. 4 , JUTX3E COONOR SPEAKS. Judge Connor theme was the' vital I imporiance ei-juM a r - . ... . . m av- constitution and the bill of rights and was a powerful plea for the education of young men aa to these vital mat ters. He contended that before ths civil war the South was the best in formed section of the country on these subjects. He plead id with the mem bers of the association to In every way Inculcate a love of country and ' it constitution and aaid that next to the charges to the grand Juries, which he regarded aa of highest Importance are the opportunities ' for broadening knowledge on these subjects afforded by political speakers in campaigns, to set broadly before their hearers the value of this moat Important knowl edge. He contrasted sharply North Carolina's great bill of rights and the constitution based thereon with the constitution enacted by the last State to enter the Federal Union. He, thought the conditions In the South' since the civil war had been such that all too few people had been taught these great basic principles of devo tion to country and constitutions: that the time Is certainly now rips for im pressing upon every eltlaen these fun damental principles snd It ought to be the prayerful duty of every lawyer to say things to deepen the love . of ths institutions of our government The committee to receivrthe ap plications of the new members re ported the following admitted: Har ry McMulIan, Junius D. Grimes, Col lin H. Harding. H. C. Carter, Jr., Washington: J. H. McMulIan, Jr., Edenton; S. A. Williams, Joseph W. Little, Wilmington; P. W. McMulIan, Herford: Bennett H. Perry, Hender Quafterr"Er1 MECHANICS VP as follows i Cash.. .. (Cancellation 1 Read and -f T7T Mexican Llustang IMment Hone strained shoulders quickly and permanently rettered. Gall, Barbed Wire Cuts, Bruises and Lameness of Lirestock Uiofailirig cure for Caked udder and Sore teats in Cows. ' ,. '' A postal reqne will bring yoa FXB8 seoldet "Folate AwaHomDeetortDaary." , LYON MANUT ACTUXITKi CO, 42 H. Allread. Selma; T, H. Calvei lelgb. v C ... . '.T."TTT"'" NJSW. JJIGESTWANTKIP. . Mr. R. C- Bfrudwlck. of Oreensboro, submitted a resolution declaring a pew digest of "tha Supreme Court opinions an absolute necessity, setting out that individual effort is Inefficient and Leg islature should be asked to memorial ize the Supreme Court to have a commission prepare such a digest the cost to be nald out of the nubile funds. and pledging- the support of the bar I iji aim Dtaia iw o reduce tne coat or ine WOrlt. Hrr ud wfck saiiT lie' iftads no reflection on' tha excellent work Truth and Qualify appeal . to the Ven-InJorroei la erery walk of life and are essential to permanent success and creditable standing. " Accor ingly, it is not claimed that Syrup of Figs and Hixir of Senna ia tha only remedy of known value, but one of many reasons why it ia the best of personal and family laxatives ia- the fact itbat Jt-Ieausesv sweetens and relieves the internal organs on which it acta without any debilitating after effects and without having to increase the, quantity from time to time. . It acta pleasantly and naturally and truly aa a laxative, and its component parts are known to and approved by physicians, as it is free from all objection able substances. To get its beneficial effects always purchase the genuinsj manufactured by the California Fig Syrup Co., only, and for sale by all leading drug- gi?tr OFFICE OF THE MECHANICS PERPETUAL B. & L. ASSOCIATION. CHARLOTTE, N. 0., JUNE 22, 1908 ' k CHEERING NEWS iN HARD TIMES will be distributed among tbe dtizens of ITuly 15th next by the PERPETUAL B. & L to its shareholders of the . . -c.tt.. of mortgages., . . .M Server "With' the regularity of Solar System moving in Its orbit, has this Association, during hard or easy times, panics or no panics,matured and paid off 39 se ries, amounting to over $1,750,000.00, has been instru mental in the acquiring by its citizens of 3,000 , homes, with all that the "ownership of one's home" means. It has 2,400 shareholders, and has subscribed in shares of a par value of $2,300,000.00 on which is paid in $900, 000.00. This institution has been in existence 25 years, has-handled five millions of dollars has loons out to day of nearly $900,000.00, all these vast transactions were carried on .with an expenditure, of but 7-8 of 1 peff cent, on the current business, and without the loss of a single cent in the whole .course of its existence, ' MONEY SAVERS LEND US YOUR EARS! Applications for loans are far in excess of receipts notwithstanding our yearly receipts are' over $300,-. 000.00). We hereby point out to you the important ' fact that depositing your savings with us will net you." -61-2 per cent., while in other monied .institutions, it- -nets you but 1 83-100 per cent Then why not study your own interests, and put your spare money jtrithjusl ". wTwant more non-borrowers, or rather investors. VISITORS TO CHARLOTTE txrader; over the fofeffoine. copies of this aavertisement home with you, and when .". : you arc over the exhiliratingi pastime: of politics, see if you cannot follow our work in your respective com- ., munities. - ' r. "."" " '" , R. L COCHRANE, Sec & Treas. ' : ; , i sWfc Fiftk St, BROOKLYN, N. T. - t done by persons who bave made the digest now in use, but It Is appareat to--aUHhat-theremartabletBsprewa-; ment In the digest in recent years is far ahead of anythlnlr In North Caro- Una, and the people and bar arc alike entitled to modern digest ' - Judge -Biggs aaid . the resolution ' .-.-';' ..!" (Contlnuea on Page Nine), IfryoUr hopes are down to Z" " And you feel like "J 3." , .'.-'-. Cheer up. friend., cult your pining, Every ciou"d haa a silver lining. OtX Mrs. Joe Person's Remedy.. ".' . ' j . ' ,-y i It you have bolls and. bumpa" 'Til you feel likejoorJuu JDumpeJL: Or If you have eczema, bad. Until It makes you almost mad. Get Mm. Joe Person's Renedy. When yoa feel'"Holdrheumatlx,"" UbUI you -aay-MyL-Oee-jyrrlat : Or your stomach's outoftuna With "spring fever" as In June, Tou need Mrs. Joe Person's Remedy. 4 When your blood is pink and white ' Andyou'ye lost your appetite.. Or you Itch and cannot sleep. What's the use to moan and weep 7 Get Mra, Joe Person' Remedy. . ". ' 5 - ' " ' If you're aick thin and pale -y And your" health Is bout to fall. If you are nervous and weak Until you can scarcely speak, Tou need Mra Joe person's Remedy. ' If you've sot a weak Jung And your nerves are all unstrung, - -Or- you have -"old Indigestion" -'- -And think a cure out of the question. Get Mra Joe Psrfson's Remedy. -T If you have a "breaking out" And cannot tell what's about. Get thla remedy, don't delay! See ths druggist right away. Use Mrs. Jos Person's Remedy. Mri. Person's Remedy stands the test. Of all remedies It Is the best. Can't be beat-for time to come. Cheers jne piooa jk o ia .- ana. you njc Charlotte, on ASSOCIATION . .$64,500.00 33,000.00 $97,500.00 talse several j 'l t. 1.1.
The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
July 2, 1908, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75